FB REFUSED TO REMOVE TWERKING VIDEO OF MIN0R – EVEN IF IT BARE BUTT BECAUSE THE GENDER IS A BOY (A TYPICAL FROM HYPOCRITE ANTI PAE D0 MAINSTREAM), 8 SEPTEMBER 2023

Facebook reject our report, and kept allowed video of 3 minor boy cry in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes, worse how they claim “O it’s not violated our community guidelines, we are Pro, we hire Pro” Bs:

Facebook policy clearly state that 1) A minor kid genital will be removed even if it’s cover by transparent clothes 2) Even if no private shown but if a minor kid not wear clothes at their upper,& bottom will also be removed 3) A minor kid buttcrack will also be removed. This alone show how facebook (and probably other top media ie Instagram/ Youtube/ Tiktok etc) not being professional by betraying their own policy.

Facebook policy seem only care to protect minor girl Only (and ignorance on an Underage Boy Victim/ Dignity/ modesty), many of fb policy written “this girl’s part”, “that girl’s part”.

Think about this, Fb immediately removed ‘a minor half naked topless girl’, even can removed ‘a 1/3 naked girl’. Fb strictly removed ‘girl in undie’- let alone ‘girl’s buttcrack’.. even fb can strictly removed girl in full clothes dance just because they perceived it “se xual”, okay By thisThen How The f Fb relax allowed video of an underage boy – three minor boy, in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes during circumcision (a pseudo science practice that normalize boy se xual abuse) vid!? Hellooo

Yeah after this blatant unfairness against boy, that mainstream “anti ped0”, and “anti woke” i.e puritan feminist,& it “hero” dude, influencer, top media, United Nation still push narration “Why always only happened to girl?” and if I critic their hypocrisy = “O whataboutism again, we are fair- but boy voice (on reply section) silence, now time for girl voice (on every video from big influencer channel,& all top organization media againnn)”

Facebook also refused to removed video of ‘an underage boy who pull his pants down – exposed his minor boy buttcrack, and Twerking after adult female gave him a gesture sign to do so’. I remember when every Anti ped0 mainstream said “Twerk in dress must be count as se xual” when justify Fb, or any other media removed girl dance video, even angry when I questioned “How about sumo? Minor teen boy almost naked (with sexy mawashi only) wrestling in butt pop up style position [*which do 99% similar, or if not – it’s male nudity that been more exposed]= this people excused “well no twerk haha”. Now a video of boy pull his short shown his minor buttcrack, and Twerk after adult female told him= Fb, and this mainstream “Anti ped0, anti woke” together in their Hypocrisy mislead us to believe “It not se xual” by act blind, worse they even not shame to display their hypocrisy.

I almost think if they doesn’t care on ‘exploitation of boy at sumo, atleast they will remove boy in dress twerking’ right? Because it what they state when attacking me with “O howaboutism again” – yet now they even relax boy without shorts twerk his bare buttcrack, not care to outrage like they did if happen to girl, and even not shame with their hypocrisy.

*This is why you must understand how angry I’m with this nudity inequality, and hypocrisy- that always make justification if it objectified male even teen boy nudity (when they alone outrage crazily if it happen to female), how lot of courage I took to spoke up about male dignity/ boy modesty, how many mental it take to received ignorance, ridicule and insult, and yet still need to kept to talk diplomatically, you don’t know how many anxiety I face during raising awareness, or met new hypocrisy again… for almost 10s year, without significant change in society, even worse now rather than they admit their hypocrisy, in their ignorance they start to use “O whataboutism again” tactic to silence us… so don’t get mad if now I start my own world Cmnf project- I couldn’t force you, and you couldn’t dictate me too then.

Boy Victim of ha rassment – How hypocrite this world (feminine type of feminist, media, religious bigot, Unicef, Influencer) can be (Circum), 17 February 2022

Maybe my English is not good, but if you try to change the “frequency” a bit: you’ll realize how important my message at this meme is- How mainstream (men, women, media, modesty type of feminist, religion,& include: child orgz i.e unicef/ unwomen; politician, fbi, youtuber, and government) all relax, or underestimate (even laugh) seeing ‘tons of a na ked und erage pu ber boy been s xually harassed by Southeast asian female/ hejabi nurse Publicly’ (infront of his/ her own eyes) because of – pc cult – mantra word “circumcision”. They all- the 1 who very fast grieving just hear a story (without seeing it) rumours of ‘1 men touch 1 women’, and already in rage upset, and urges “castration, stri p men na ked, think female trauma don’t defend the criminal, support the real victim” 24/7= suddenly 180 degree opposite if the gender were reverse (boy victim by adult female pre dator), this just 1 example, yet I’m the one who been labelled by them as “beyond disgusting” for calling this out. Don’t forget to give credit to my name, feel free to share this meme

The Irony – How Southeast Asian Feminine Type Feminist, and Mother who very Talented when Grieving &Whine “Castra tion” of Suspected ‘Men Pa e do’ (just by hear a story), yet very relax even if seeing ‘Adult Female Touch Boy inappropriately’ (infront of her own eyes), 17 October 2021

Before entering my main point, let me made this Clear: I’m not here for “attacking” any group of people, nor this about ‘ha te’, I’m here to exercise my Freedom of Speech to speak up Unpopular Taboo issues, that is: How boy face hypocrisy from so called ‘Anti p ae do superhero’ in society, which mean I do raise awareness to protect boy too. Big social media like Youtube/ Facebook/ Instagram (maybe Tiktok too) several time removed my post, or suspend me because either misinterpreted my point, you know unpopular view often seen as “offensive” since more taboo (or maybe behind the authority who review my post is a ‘feminine type of feminist’, or ‘religious dude’ who to be honest dislike my unpopular view since against their narrative believe that ‘only female suffer, only men evil’ bs, which why twisted any of my word that they can twist, the newest was when instagram removed my comment that they twisted as “ha te speech”, just because there’s 1 angry word that I put out of my frustration, in the end of the day: we’re human who can frustrate too don’t we?).

So (living for 30s years at Southeast Asia) I observed how modesty type of feminist, (& it’s “superhero” dude), media i.e Bbc Southeast Asia, politician, and government was very good when campaign & lecture us ‘how men p a ed o should be castra te’ (or strip nak d, or even b*rn alive) without mercy, they will said something sound like “Think about girl trauma, how pa e d o act can be normalize? prove only girl are victim” (when everytime there’s a story of ‘girl victim of men pa e do’= it very easy to viral, media make the news 24/7, almost all of the people angry/ sad, and want to help, which then police & even mr. President alone in action. Which by this: the narrative of “girl victim normalize” alone is debunked).

Media often try their best to campaign female victim (by evil men), sadly ignored male victim (esp if the predator is a female), which I’ll prove by photos below

Yet on the other day they alone (majority of people) celebrate circum cision fest were bunch of an undr age pu ber boy been str ip frontal bottom less at hall without curtain (you think it’s ‘fine’? imagine if reverse: I give you bonus, imagine the girl still wear underwear), most of the cutter must be adult female learner (“Boy should feel Lucky” they said), Inappropriate thing do happened, boy cry (adult female after touching boy then give boy a gift, for boy to stop crying), and all southeast asian female/ mother know it, or see it infront of her own eyes= ‘a normal day’ not even realize their hypocrisy, not realize how it’s a ‘boy victim, and boy trauma’ that been normalize by this ra pe culture, by the way can I castra te Vagina of pae d o adult female (towards boy)? you not even let people str ip her don’t you “Oh even if she seem look like mo lest the boy, the castra tion of vulva/ str ip a pa e do women is a hara ssment understand?”

Another excused was “many boy want it therefore okay”, this is biased, let me put this way, if boy feel uncomfort/ shy will be str ip bottom less during circum cision, fear of s x ual abuse/ geni tal cutting, he cry then see his surrounding act perfectly normal, even encourage him= off course he will think “maybe i’m the 1 whose wrong”, on the other hand I remember prudish feminist told a story about a girl who think she got ‘sign of love’ by adult men who touch her, and this feminist said “You been har ass you know, you should start cry, and grieving”, see?

See? how biased this all, before you excusing “circum is abu se, but it different from pa e d “, don’t lie to yourself I already shown the evidence that ‘innap thing also happened at this circum tradition esp if you let adult female to interact with undr age pu ber boy’ (Funny how anti leftist love to said, when it come to trans toilet: “Oh is that so difficult to understand don’t let men enter female room?”.. yet they alone doesn’t understand that ‘Don’t Let Adult Female to Get Easy Access to Interact With Bottom less Undr age Pu ber Boy at Circum’ *by the way some hypocrite female who enter male toilet can also see, even stare at bunch of peeing men & boy too, since urinal have no door, yes peeing penis + his undie can be seen, even the 1 who try not to look will still see men undie/ male way of peeing, way of men opening his zip.. again since men pee at no door urinoir difficult not to see, and men who uncomfort exist too, like me)

Last I want to satire Oblationrun / Pylon run (Cfnm aka ‘objectification of male student’s bodies’ fest) which was held by F institution University of Philippines at prudish Southeast Asian country by showing them this Cmnf memes.

Five women protest naked inside the Chamber of Deputies on March 08, 2010 in Mexico City demanding the resignation of Mexican President Felipe Calderon in the framnework of the International Women’s day. AFP PHOTO/HO

Another update: at Cambodia they have culture at their rural area were ‘female (mother, grandmother, aunty, nurse, nanny, caretaker) can “touch, or even worse “kiss/ s ucks” an under a ge Boy pe nis/ nu dity’. Study (which some of it writing I shown on meme below) inform many people still thinks ‘an Adult touch/ “kiss” mi nor is not “se xual” (as long as the adult is a female, and the mi nor – who been touch/ s ucks when he nak ed – is a Boy)’ (I add: in which if it is ‘men who touch 1 (full dress) girl waist/ just leg’ will be count as “s exual hara ssment/ s exual”), Another horrible excused they give is “If female touch/ “kiss” under a ge boy nu dity” is must be because “she care/ love Boy”. This is very bias:

1. They alone already make a ‘conclusion’ on 1st place (that “it will be only ‘s exual’ if men do it to a girl”, or “if adult female do it (s exually ha rassed) to an under a ge boy – we must believe it purely because of “care/ love”). If we want to be objective don’t ever jump to conclusion on 1st place.
2. Study’s interview show ‘female who said find pe nis attractive’ then took an effort to knee down, pull boy pants, then pull of boy underwear, and – not only touch boy pe nis anymore yet even – s ucks boy pe nis (if photos of illustration I gave on meme is from Cambodia mean: she also want to record it for her sweet memory (or “documentary” as that society will said)). How the F it’s “not s exual” anymore? “O it not s exual haha” said “anti pe do”, or “anti ra pist” mainstream who often lecture us “How you said men touch leg of (full clothed) girl is not s exual?”
3. If adult female have a dirty mind, she live Cambodia, and she did her creep thing to a boy= she can hide her pervertness in the name of “culture”, and ‘her pe do ness’ been praise as “care”, who knows?
4. This female never do it to a girl, but always to a boy, sure nothing s exual
5. Study said ‘erecti on’ already happened, how it’s somehow “not s exual”?
6. Think, if men, and women both – with a desire – do a ha rassment (touch/ kiss) towards mi nor/ child of their opposite s exes= the men will fastly realize, and admit it “pe do”, but the female will think “she did it out of love, men must more do it in dirty mind”, why? because that what we been taught at “school” right? and you encourage it
7. If father angry during his travel to Cambodia- his son been touch by a lady, so in his anger, he revenge by touch her daughter back in emotion= sure “only men do it with s exual intention”
8. Imagine if there’s a cult were men can kiss a babygirl, baby- which most men find NoT s exual, mean big chance men kiss cheek of full dress babygirl is not because of s exual thing, or he just follow a culture, or aka ‘he is victim of culture’ but anti pe do (conservative – rights wing, feminist,& it’s “superhero” dude, crime story youtuber/ influencer, politician, top media ie Bbc) will simply said “it ra pe culture”, “men must be perv, stop victim blaming, period. Castration” (look it’s just a men kiss (full dress) baby at cheek, except if men allow to kiss nu de mi nor). Yet the moment in real life it ‘adult female who can even hand job/ b j nak ed boy’ somehow “O she do it because victim of cult itself”, No, she did it in her pervertness, and hide it in the name of “culture”, she not a victim, she’s a pe do/ female ra pist, and the boy is a Victim of ra pe. Anti pe do alone love to victim blaming if perpe trator is female, and the victim is a boy.
9. About “how if boy smile?” – I remember feminist told me “there’s a girl who think a men who lick her V is a sign of love/ care, and she like it”, then this feminist said to the girl “you been ra pe, and you must grieving,& crying now”

Stop kriit now

Evidence Sumo Boy do been ‘s exualize’ by female/ feminist/ gay perv web (Unicef & Fbi don’t care), 27 may 2021

So in my previous post, I promise you to give back up evidence of what I said, that is: Und erage Puber Sumo Boy Semi Nudity can be ‘objectified’, or exploited by either Female pae do, or Gay pae do, or Modesty type of Feminist who wish for “revenge”. Here’s the prev link were I counter people who laugh at me, he (in sinister) claiming “Only cuties netflix s exualize by pae do since have twerking, while sumo boy – even if wrest in ‘popping up boy butt’ style + even if no short anymore/ only in underwear (mawashi/ fundoshi) – somehow will still never attract pre dator/ never been s exualize by paee do”, in which my reply can be read here: https://reverseoblationrun.wordpress.com/2021/02/22/cuties-netflix-vs-sumo-boy-not-comparable-said-an-ignorant-men-ill-show-why-its-do-comparable-22-february-2021/

So here the perv female web/ seem perv feminist web who “revenge” to us by showing many naked male photos (which actually just prove prudish feminist was wrong for claiming “nudity only happen to female”, or “tradition only exposed female form” since this web alone prove that it actually the other way round: ‘even before modesty type of feminist were born= male nudity/ male semi nudity already been exposed/ objectified long time ago since our ancestor exist). Worse s/he not only post adult men body But Dare To Post Undr age Boy Pic too, this pic below is one of the worse expl oitation of undr age boy, photos of perv adult female volunteer (not just touch yet) pull groin (penis) of an undr age boy (remember, not just touch boy in undie, but already penis) Publicly, now you can see that this obviously do pae do web:

• 

I often hear Southeast Asian (modesty type of) feminist (include Eastern Asian feminist who live at Southeast Asia) very fast, and very good at grieving as F if the victim is a girl, they often shout in tantrum “Demand justice, where is justice for girl? cas trate all perv adult men/ strip him & burn him alive”, and praise by mainstream (religious bigot, pc cult media, “superhero” dude that common we see) who will perceived “make sense, F if there’s people (me) who dare to said it inhumane, they don’t care care for girl victim” (*even if rejecting barbaric punishment doesn’t mean we don’t care girl victim). Now! ladies, and gentleman can I hear the same grieving, and demand the same barbaric punishment- if the victim of harass is boy & the perv is an adult female? like above pic? *Don’t excused “O but it’s tradition, she’s legal volunteer hehe, so okay if she pull boy penis, it just for photos documentary hehe” because I often watch at media/ comment section: ‘a prudish southeast asian female who lecture us (men) that- even for father to touch private area of his (clothed) daughter is a crime’, now if you see this above photos- this female (who not even mother of this boy) dare to (not only touch) but even pull (naked) boy penis at crowded area, how come you easily said “forgive female pae do above?” checkmate, I exposed southeast/ asian (prudish) female hypocrisy.

Back to topic here below that web do s exualize sumo boy semi nudity:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

So to people who laugh me in sinister, who perceived for me to asking & compare: why mainstream netizen angry over clothed girl dance cuties netflix, but ‘normal’ day if it about sumo boy wrestler popping up his butt (even if already without pants) – as somehow I’m ludicrous, you all is the 1 who been biased, not me

Next, I’ll make article about Southeast Asian mother & it’s modesty type of feminist hypocrisy when it come to ‘castr ation system’, so stay tuned

To be honest you all don’t know how (as a male) I feel anxious, traumatize, panic for searching this all evidence that exist on my blog for almost 8 years (so it not only female who can traumatize, it make me sick since as a men no mainstream can understand men traumatize on this kind of issues, only care female, worse can still claim “only happen to female”, or “only male who live happily, he should check his privilege” , or … etc. Actually I just hope when I speak up atleast listen to men stress, yet mainstream ignorant always said “where’s the evidence that boy been exploited? only girl you simp, stop whining just help the girl”.. yeah this forced me to take evidence even if my hand is shaking, and crying, also I can help girl victim as long as you all mainstream, and media giving the same equal amount of grieving, and tantrum on exploitation of boy victim + demand the same barbaric punishment to all perv female who act pae do on boy (& can got away with it by mantra word “circumcisi on”).

You witness, I do already try to speak up wisely for around 8 years by seeing at this blog (which do took a lot of effort, energy, and mentally). if I – who have high paranoia anxiety disorder – only got ignored, shame, and laugh after I speak up, then don’t accused me if I make ‘my own world’, I mean: for example I uncomfort seeing only ‘objectification’ of men nudity that can somehow allowed at public fest by mainstream, I realize if this were reverse= Sjw will outrage & banned it, I want to complain but no friends, no Sjw who help me, confused & unconfidence to speak, forced myself to speak, yet got ignored, or laugh, they asking evidence, I try push myself to look for evidence (even if it uncomfort to see like Cfnm fest that happened at public), after got evidence I speak again, but still got shame by mainstream/ no media listen to my voice= off course rather than anxiety alone, and get mad forever, better for me to make ‘my own world’, and after that surely you all will falsely accused me as hypocrite perv.

Cuties Netflix Vs Sumo Boy “Not Comparable” said an ignorant men, I’ll show why it’s do comparable, 22 February 2021

So a (typical mainstream) dude replying me when I ask “Hei, you all angry over ‘s*x ual*zation’ of girl who (just) dance (in full uniform) at Cuties Netflix so much like crazy, but then – by borrowing your mindset – how about und*r ag* sumo boy who being expos*d (or ‘objectified’ in my word) wear ‘undie’ only fight/ compete at Public- Even Held by Legal Sport at Asia (which often more prudish when it come to female custom), boy popping up his b* tt which actually like twerking too”.

Then I got a reply from a this dude who (in sinister) reply me (in a nutshell he said something sound like “Twerking is designed to be imhertly s* xual unlike sumo. To put what essentially equates to soft core ch*ld p * rn on a popular & easily accessible streaming platform for ALL the p* d* to watch & feel emboldened by, is not comparable to a sport that been around for centuries, and is meant to showcase, strength, and athleticism, and pride, I’ll leave you with this one note.”

Now, You been subjective, My answer is: How do he sure ‘only twerking is s exual’? don’t you think a puber boy with undie only & wrestling ‘by pop up his ass’ style can be s exual? Why he so sure only twerking 1 that can be soft core child p*rn then? How he sure pe d* will only watch cuties netflix? while sumo boy – which also easily accessible will not be watch by female/ gay pe d*? Fyi there’s female pe d* (/ gay pe d*) web who include sumo boy videos frequently on their web for soft core child p*rn (will show the evidence later), also this two is actually similar enough so how on earth he think ‘only sumo boy who pop up his boy butt- without short’ is for “pride”? when he complain about girl twerking.

The essence is actually the same. a ‘girl (in uniform) twerking (/dancing) at (popular accessible streaming platform) netflix’ vs ‘(an und*rage) boy (wear undie only) compete (wrestling in ‘d*ggy style’ position) at (popular accessible) sumo (Public) competition which then broadcast on (accessible watching family platform) youtube/ Instagram/ tv’= is almost similar- if not ‘more exp*sing boy’ I would said. How on earth for almost exact same situation, this guy easily jump to conclusion that: one must be “s exual & soft core p*rn” while another one must be about “pride, athleticism” (/ else, for exact same situation one should be banned & teach our kid modesty, while another one should be protected, let kid be shameless & be happy).

Another of his subjectivity claim, how on earth he so sure that no pr*dat*r ever that will attracted to view sumo boy on youtube? surely sumo boy can be attractive for (male/ female pr*dat*r too- it’s not about ‘must twerking first’ to be “s exualize” some attracted just to see boy in mawashi (Fyi female/ gay pae do web include sumo puber boy vid on their page, will show you the evidence later*)… on the other hand even pr*dat*r can view a ‘full uniform’ cuties netflix as normal/ not attractive – esp if he live at Europe, which already accustomed with ‘skin’- a tanktop modest uniform shouldn’t be a big deal even if you dancing (Fyi twerking & other dance almost similar, it have moving ass movement too to be honest). It’s funny when (example) sumo boy is a victim of objectification= they will probably perceived “nah, even if pre dator exist, they only see it at their own room, so not harm the boy”, but if Cuties “Don’t you understand it accessible for evil guy to watch at their own room?”

Let me put this way:

1. If it’s about ‘Cuties Netflix Twerking Girl’ Vs ‘Sumo Boy Fight in D*ggy Style position’= “O Not comparable, even if she still in proper uniform dance, count it as “s* xu al*zation of girl”, ignored her pride happiness of dancing & let bring fear paranoia of p* d* (who will just watch it at their own room at Netflix apps to be honest), while the reverse sumo boy must not be count as s exualization- even if the boy almost nu d* & wrestling by popping up his boy b utt style publicly, ignored even if sometime boy *ss already been zoom close up by media at youtube, ignored bystander who took photos near them: we must only count that boy “moving ass” sumo as “pride of sport, athleticism”.

2. If it’s about ‘Cuties Netflix Twerking G*rl’ Vs (Somehow in parallel world) it’s ‘Sumo girl who wear und*e only compete’= You all will angry over Cuties, but will perceived that Sumo girl wear mawashi only is more worse since ‘more revealing’ + ‘have a look a like of twerking movement’ which make most mainstream more upset, uproar than Cuties

3. If it’s about ‘Tank top boy Twerking’ (or even ‘t*pless bruce lee boy – Ryusei Imai show off his muscles’) vs (in parallel world) ‘Sumo girl wear und*e only compete’= “Sumo g*rl need to be banned, s* xu aliza t*on, Castr*te for men who held this…, twerking what?”

Above meme show you that prudish feminist & “superhero” dude will still just try to banned “girl in swimsuit one only” (even if already no twerking at all). Now They’ll perceived “semi nudity is s exual” if it about girl in swimsuit (but if boy wear undie only= “O not se xual, where’s the twerking?”.. see?). *Fyi probably that swimsuit catwalk already extinct/ banned…. now before you claim that this not comparable (again) “O sumo boy sport, while this catwalk, different”, look at pic below: a ‘muscles show’ were t* en Boy join, more apple to apple right? I’ll wait for your condemnation then towards this pic below (were undrage puber boy been objectified walk at stage topless & show off his muscles).. esp I’ll wait feminist Rita Panahi to whine just like when she mad over catwalk girl.

By the way, bonus memes of mine about ‘female are visual to topless male too’, feel free to share it. also remember: a cheerleader female who s* cks boy p* nis since she couldn’t resist it with her senses, remember? (U.s case).

Also some People reply to my blog but I hv no times to reply them 1 by 1, give me time.

*Before haters accused me as hypocrite, I wrote this article since I observed: if it about girl= mainstream already try their best for campaign/ banned it like all example mentioned above (even castr*tion system legalize), but if a boy= cricket (even the worse one were bunch of boy being str*p publicly – no curtain & ge n* tal being cut during mgm/ circ*m cision were many boy cry either shy or pain= most Asian female/ mother still think it should be “normal” (let alone the sumo boy), the mother even let an adult female to took photos of undrage bottomless boy (which if reverse they will be cry baby again – count it as “har*ss”/ “ab*se”), then this adult female very relax try to fool the crying boy by gift in the end.. yet what I saw on tv only about “girl victim” issues once a mom play victim on tv act like “O why ab* se to girl been normalize?”- when almost all media + feminist + police + politician + society all do help her to jailed that guy at that time without mercy, without excused, this mom even enter national news…. said it again “only girl victim normalize”.. hypocrite..This is why I raise awareness on boy modesty & boy dignity & mentioned boy victim of harassment by female. ** It’s funny when I question about country A were only boy been exp*sed while girl already protected, some one reply me “How about girl at country B? hypocrite” (when at country B boy at there also been expos*d aka already equal) ***I personally less care if already “equal in their dresscode”, get it?

Female are Visual – Bulge (male with undie), Peeing Male (She enter male toilet), and Exhibit*onist Male Via Video Call (still can able to) attract female eyes (part 2), 15 January 2021

Hi, Happy 2021, in this article I have no intention to discredit any group, nor supporting ‘har*ssment’ by (not so smart) exh*b guy. I purely want to show my back up evidence why I disagree with (modesty type of) South/ Asian feminist, Media (i.e hypocrite BBC), and religious bigot who claim “female never visual at all”. Sure again like my part 1 article on this [ https://reverseoblationrun.wordpress.com/2020/07/19/female-are-visual-topless-male-part-1-19-july-2020/ ] , I’ll said it again: yes, male & female are different But that doesn’t mean “men are mega visual while female – like an angel – never visual at all” like mainstream love to propagate “O how huge the disparity is!”. So my answer is: female can visually attracted too (towards her opposite sexes, male anatomy) especially if we made male body taboo at public society, so now the theme is about ‘bulge (men with undierwear), peeing male (she inappropriately enter male toilet which have ‘no door’ urinal), and male exh*b video call’.

An Asian Ladies in rush came towards Buakaw (muay thai male atheletes) when he got kick on the groin, and must be check by drop his pants. Notice a women come with smile, and took a photos of her Non Husband Bulge/ Male Undie

Do you smell the hypocrisy here? yeah typical hypocrisy from South/ Asian modesty type of feminist, BBC (king of Pc Cult pro feminist), and religious bigot.

Hejabi always lecture me (something sound like): “How visual p*rv men are, see our hair at pool, female never attracted to male form”- taking photos of stranger male criminal who been strip exposing his bulge, and wore underwear only at public (like I said since taboo men wear undie at public there= more captivating for female eyes). That ‘try to cover her eyes while recording men with underwear only’ seem a good prove of ‘how female never attracted’ (Now, you can excused anything, but who knows if she do have ‘feeling of attracted’ when decide to recording that moment of male being str*pped’ whatever the reason she may said).

Now I witnessed more than 4 times female look at peeing male on urinoir (6-7 times if I remember)

Apologize for my poor English- since I’m emotional when make this meme, but you get the point of hypocrisy

Two hejabi ‘pe rv’ spotted. Imagine if this were reverse in gender ‘2 male enter female room’= Modesty type of South/ Asian feminist, Bbc the hypocrite, and religious bigot will make it viral & campaign 24/7 again. What I taught you here Never been taught on gender studies class, so subscribe me

Another prove that (modesty type of) Southeast Asian feminist claim that somehow “All female never attracted towards stranger male exh*bitio*st, even all female angry over it”= is WRONG BIASED. *By the way I Never support Exh*b guy **That Exh*b guy on vidcall (meme above) is NOT me, It’s from internet- He’s Southeast Asian Skin, while Me are Eastern Asian (I as male will never ‘objectified’ my own precious male bodies especially if ‘female not even half nak*d’ (even if she do half nak*d: I still in doubt because think “It’s not fair if she can see men full nud* yet I couldn’t see her bottom part since still wear double layer clothes/ pants + undie”).

That’s it for today, subscribe me, support. If you agree, and please keep in touch with me. Again I not mean to ‘attack’ any group, but I must speak the truth, and sometime – in order to speak up – either my word accidentally hurts, (or you mainstream are too sensitive over satire on this issues, because let be honest this topic always protected by pc cult/ political correctness, make you all never heard of this).

Female are Visual – Topless Male (part 1), 19 July 2020

Asian (Hypocrite) feminine (modesty type of) feminist, Religious bigot, and (big legal) media love to be  very ‘pc cult’ by their ‘propaganda’ that “female never visual” to suit their own agenda. Girl will seem ‘less criminal’ for being ‘pervy’, and she can also more easy play ‘objectification’ victim cards over than the men for the exact same (or atleast similar) situation. Mainstream sadly buy their bullshit.

biased mainstream view 1

biased mainstream view 2

Do female visual? I’ll not said ‘we must 100% same’, but society try to inflate the differences like somehow “women are at heaven (/ never visual), while men are at hell (/ always visual)” (not literally by the way since I’m an atheist), when actually we (men & women) are still pretty similar when come to this kind of issues. Here below my argument.

FEMALE DO VISUAL – TOPLESS MALE

1.Female can attracted to male chest (even after numerous topless male been exposed all the time at public)

Now Asian feminine feminist be like “Lol”, or

typical feminine (modesty type of) feminist who try to defend ‘female never visual’ narrative for their agenda

1a. There’s a female who flirting when there’s a men topless

“no look culture” by Japanese, Hejabis, and (modesty type of) Feminist Fail

Now modesty feminine feminist will said “It’s just accidental she look back, and that topless guy happen there”.

1b. There’s a female who admit she can attracted to shirtless male.

Thanks ‘body confidence’ feminism for be honest- I respect you

Now modesty feminine feminist will said “No, you can’t said it real girl who tweet” – even if it’s obviously tweet from her real account.

1c. There’s a real female who admit she can admire men form by her eyes, at youtube.

If you ever watch her channel, especially this specific videos- you’ll know she do admit ‘she attracted to see hot / at least handsome guy. I respect your honesty & kindness girl

Now modesty feminine feminist will said “Yeah, but we will only said that the guy is hot, but we will not photos like guy did”.

Here Asian feminine (modesty type of) feminist who debate me saying ‘female will never visual’- yet not realizing that (in this paragraph) she actually admit female can admire hot topless guy too

Now this photos above is from Asian feminine feminist who debate me, and without she realize she actually admit that ‘female do can attracted to shirtless guy’.

1d. There’s a female who took photos of buff topless male on wedding party, girl who immediately try to took photos when male athlete start to open his shirt, and female who touch male topless athletes/ actors.

It’s okay if she want to photos topless guy- but please don’t apply double standard society/ feminine feminist..

this 2 ladies by instinct choose to touch this young male chest athletes first, so here for you (southeast) asian feminine (modesty type of) feminism who said “even if we attracted to shirtless guy, we’ll just said: ok he’s hot but then nothing happen we will not harass him”- fail

*This’s just topless guy, let alone if he bottomless.

**Not to forgot male topless all the time at public make female less curious while we men censored/ been taboo from seeing topless female if at public (especially at southeast asia, or even mid east, off course make male more obsessed than the reverse). My back up: look at some Europe place were ‘female topless at public is normal’- men just view topless female like we view ‘bikini at beach’ here, on other hand at Mid East since even only (just) female hair is taboo (even) at pool- which make Mid East guy staring when seeing (just) neck that get revealed accidentally by her, because the men must so repressed it there. It called logic.

*** Some feaminine Asia feminist called me “that just claim never exist such thing”- at 1930 at U.s when men forbidden to topless at beach, it do make female curious seeing male (who suddenly revealed his toplessness, and it become scandalized).

****I know society – still favor female – will said that some of this i.e ‘Zac at Ellen show – where girl applause when Zac show his abs’ case as “scripted” (so only minor of my example were you’re able to claim that it’s “scripted” right?), but the producer make it like that because we know ‘girl can admire hot guy actors’s bodies’, and the audience reaction is natural, and also “scripted” doesn’t mean ‘Ellen & other female audience doesn’t like it’ right? Who knows Ellen & other girl happy to got that chance.

I’ll continue series 2 about ‘Female who visual to stranger male exhibitionism exist too’, or maybe ‘female attracted to male semi nudity’, actually I just want to make it all in 1 package but since I hv no time, and you’ll be wait for too long, so I divide it. So stay tuned! subscribe me, Regards