I disagree with mob lynching/ “jungle law”/ castration even to a ra pist (yes, I know what mainstream think now), but here my argument:
Jungle law gave a privillege for female criminal (even to a female pe do – towards boy victim). female pe do (not little like what you want to believe), this female pe do will far less likely lynch by mob, even if in a very rare case female pe do been strip nak .. (okey, fur, just strip till bikini, or bra top – with pants on), beaten/ tortured by (clothed) men, and/ or her vagina got Cut infront of little girl at public= mainstream (feminist,& it “hero” dude, media i.e Bbc, and influencer) will perceived it differently, they will perceived it as: mob harassed a female (pae do) “O it still harassed women no matter what crime she did, only police who can punish her, jailed the men who did it, think girl trauma” (something like that). Yet even tons of a male thief can be strip full naked, tortured sadistically, worse even burn alive infront of boy at public (were female audience laugh, and photos without consent)= relax ‘normal non gender issues’ day comment by feminist,& it “macho” dude, media, and influencer.. no one care boy trauma, no one said it gender issues, it bring Hypocrisy to the next level (How do I know? ton of male thief been strip, beaten, even burn= normal day, 1 female thief tore a bit at her clothed/ other slap a bit= “gender issues” by grieving female,& it “macho” men, media, and influencer i.e ‘Pakistani female thief who tore her clothed alone, yet international media like ‘Wion’ said “men strip female thief”, and campaign push gender issues narrative’. Another ‘husband who cheat been castrate’= female celebrate at comment section, ‘wife who cheat got chili/ sauce at her vagina’= female ask justice at comment section. This is a Sign that hypocrisy reaction will most likely to happen when jungle law happen to female pae do vs male ra pist)
Boy who trauma seeing only male criminal lynch by mob will grown and revenge to society, maybe even to a women.
Investigation at Court do needed, when there is a female who said she’s a victim, and the men who said ‘he’s not a ra pist’ = it only a word between two human, only scientific investigation who can show the truth. It not little a case were ‘after the guy die after been harassed/ strip, and beaten by mob’ it turn out that the accusation is False i.e Nayirah case (a 15 yo Kuwait girl who make a lie statement with convincing tears- which then turn out that it just simply a ‘crocodile tear’, or a Jis case were male janitor beaten to dead by police after a mother lie about her child been ra pe at toilet, or a Russian guy who die after lynch by mob (of bunch of ‘less brain’ “macho” men) after a girl Jokes ‘he touch me’. So I ‘Reverseoblationrun’ Reject, and Disagree with jungle law even to a ra pist, here my meme evidence of what I said, feel free to share it.
Remember this female face – the biggest Hypocrite ever, she campaign for girl victim as F, said even if no evidence we should believe female word, repost every female who said she once been victim/ without evidence.. yet when I show boy victim (by hejabi pae do) straight at her faces were she can see it with her own eyes= simply blocked, then with my other account I realize she put insta story saying “Don’t waste energy for something unworthed” (boy victim?)Bonus, after me being pissed by hypocrite society who protect female pae do only (from being lynch by mob), yet male who stole a tv can even be strip, and beaten by mob.. so here a Female nude in non se xual context, and with consent
I already spoke up diplomatically for 8-9 years for demanding equality at oblation run & pylon run. I have facing anxiety because of this unfair ‘objectification, and sexua lization of tons of male student bodies, every year, at every city since 1970’ at university of Philippines, (more anxiety when) I have to endure pain when checking oblation run (cfnm fest that stress me) just for getting the news, an evidence, and protest – just to being ignored, being shame, being laugh by hypocrite mainstream (9 years already). I do have try diplomatic way just to realize that I got slow progress, worse to see this hypocrite mainstream – who said I’m narrow minded for complaining objectification of ton of male student full nudity at institution – on other day make a big deal over just 1 ‘non naked’ female who willingly wear lingerie at Boracay beach (for example), “objectification” they said, it push my button, enough is enough!
So month or maybe year ago I have plan to back on making or creating my own Cmnf world to challenge them- a new way. We called it ‘Magdangal Project’, and you can check at ‘Magdangal demonstration rule page’, I already have volunteer but I need a bit ‘assist’ from my supporter, support us on patreon (were you can see the photos that not put here, and the photos that will be post there first), it not big amount of money, I know this is covid era, and I also want people to keep their trust on my activism, we just need a bit – for our work can be more productive. your contribution is appreciated:
Maybe my English is not good, but if you try to change the “frequency” a bit: you’ll realize how important my message at this meme is- How mainstream (men, women, media, modesty type of feminist, religion,& include: child orgz i.e unicef/ unwomen; politician, fbi, youtuber, and government) all relax, or underestimate (even laugh) seeing ‘tons of a na ked und erage pu ber boy been s xually harassed by Southeast asian female/ hejabi nurse Publicly’ (infront of his/ her own eyes) because of – pc cult – mantra word “circumcision”. They all- the 1 who very fast grieving just hear a story (without seeing it) rumours of ‘1 men touch 1 women’, and already in rage upset, and urges “castration, stri p men na ked, think female trauma don’t defend the criminal, support the real victim” 24/7= suddenly 180 degree opposite if the gender were reverse (boy victim by adult female pre dator), this just 1 example, yet I’m the one who been labelled by them as “beyond disgusting” for calling this out. Don’t forget to give credit to my name, feel free to share this meme
Before entering my main point, let me made this Clear: I’m not here for “attacking” any group of people, nor this about ‘ha te’, I’m here to exercise my Freedom of Speech to speak up Unpopular Taboo issues, that is: How boy face hypocrisy from so called ‘Anti p ae do superhero’ in society, which mean I do raise awareness to protect boy too. Big social media like Youtube/ Facebook/ Instagram (maybe Tiktok too) several time removed my post, or suspend me because either misinterpreted my point, you know unpopular view often seen as “offensive” since more taboo (or maybe behind the authority who review my post is a ‘feminine type of feminist’, or ‘religious dude’ who to be honest dislike my unpopular view since against their narrative believe that ‘only female suffer, only men evil’ bs, which why twisted any of my word that they can twist, the newest was when instagram removed my comment that they twisted as “ha te speech”, just because there’s 1 angry word that I put out of my frustration, in the end of the day: we’re human who can frustrate too don’t we?).
So (living for 30s years at Southeast Asia) I observed how modesty type of feminist, (& it’s “superhero” dude), media i.e Bbc Southeast Asia, politician, and government was very good when campaign & lecture us ‘how men p a ed o should be castra te’ (or strip nak d, or even b*rn alive) without mercy, they will said something sound like “Think about girl trauma, how pa e d o act can be normalize? prove only girl are victim” (when everytime there’s a story of ‘girl victim of men pa e do’= it very easy to viral, media make the news 24/7, almost all of the people angry/ sad, and want to help, which then police & even mr. President alone in action. Which by this: the narrative of “girl victim normalize” alone is debunked).
Media often try their best to campaign female victim (by evil men), sadly ignored male victim (esp if the predator is a female), which I’ll prove by photos below
Yet on the other day they alone (majority of people) celebrate circum cision fest were bunch of an undr age pu ber boy been str ip frontal bottom less at hall without curtain (you think it’s ‘fine’? imagine if reverse: I give you bonus, imagine the girl still wear underwear), most of the cutter must be adult female learner (“Boy should feel Lucky” they said), Inappropriate thing do happened, boy cry (adult female after touching boy then give boy a gift, for boy to stop crying), and all southeast asian female/ mother know it, or see it infront of her own eyes= ‘a normal day’ not even realize their hypocrisy, not realize how it’s a ‘boy victim, and boy trauma’ that been normalize by this ra pe culture, by the way can I castra te Vagina of pae d o adult female (towards boy)? you not even let people str ip her don’t you “Oh even if she seem look like mo lest the boy, the castra tion of vulva/ str ip a pa e do women is a hara ssment understand?”
Another excused was “many boy want it therefore okay”, this is biased, let me put this way, if boy feel uncomfort/ shy will be str ip bottom less during circum cision, fear of s x ual abuse/ geni tal cutting, he cry then see his surrounding act perfectly normal, even encourage him= off course he will think “maybe i’m the 1 whose wrong”, on the other hand I remember prudish feminist told a story about a girl who think she got ‘sign of love’ by adult men who touch her, and this feminist said “You been har ass you know, you should start cry, and grieving”, see?
See? how biased this all, before you excusing “circum is abu se, but it different from pa e d “, don’t lie to yourself I already shown the evidence that ‘innap thing also happened at this circum tradition esp if you let adult female to interact with undr age pu ber boy’ (Funny how anti leftist love to said, when it come to trans toilet: “Oh is that so difficult to understand don’t let men enter female room?”.. yet they alone doesn’t understand that ‘Don’t Let Adult Female to Get Easy Access to Interact With Bottom less Undr age Pu ber Boy at Circum’ *by the way some hypocrite female who enter male toilet can also see, even stare at bunch of peeing men & boy too, since urinal have no door, yes peeing penis + his undie can be seen, even the 1 who try not to look will still see men undie/ male way of peeing, way of men opening his zip.. again since men pee at no door urinoir difficult not to see, and men who uncomfort exist too, like me)
Last I want to satire Oblationrun / Pylon run (Cfnm aka ‘objectification of male student’s bodies’ fest) which was held by F institution University of Philippines at prudish Southeast Asian country by showing them this Cmnf memes.
Five women protest naked inside the Chamber of Deputies on March 08, 2010 in Mexico City demanding the resignation of Mexican President Felipe Calderon in the framnework of the International Women’s day. AFP PHOTO/HO
Another update: at Cambodia they have culture at their rural area were ‘female (mother, grandmother, aunty, nurse, nanny, caretaker) can “touch, or even worse “kiss/ s ucks” an under a ge Boy pe nis/ nu dity’. Study (which some of it writing I shown on meme below) inform many people still thinks ‘an Adult touch/ “kiss” mi nor is not “se xual” (as long as the adult is a female, and the mi nor – who been touch/ s ucks when he nak ed – is a Boy)’ (I add: in which if it is ‘men who touch 1 (full dress) girl waist/ just leg’ will be count as “s exual hara ssment/ s exual”), Another horrible excused they give is “If female touch/ “kiss” under a ge boy nu dity” is must be because “she care/ love Boy”. This is very bias:
They alone already make a ‘conclusion’ on 1st place (that “it will be only ‘s exual’ if men do it to a girl”, or “if adult female do it (s exually ha rassed) to an under a ge boy – we must believe it purely because of “care/ love”). If we want to be objective don’t ever jump to conclusion on 1st place.
Study’s interview show ‘female who said find pe nis attractive’ then took an effort to knee down, pull boy pants, then pull of boy underwear, and – not only touch boy pe nis anymore yet even – s ucks boy pe nis (if photos of illustration I gave on meme is from Cambodia mean: she also want to record it for her sweet memory (or “documentary” as that society will said)). How the F it’s “not s exual” anymore? “O it not s exual haha” said “anti pe do”, or “anti ra pist” mainstream who often lecture us “How you said men touch leg of (full clothed) girl is not s exual?”
If adult female have a dirty mind, she live Cambodia, and she did her creep thing to a boy= she can hide her pervertness in the name of “culture”, and ‘her pe do ness’ been praise as “care”, who knows?
This female never do it to a girl, but always to a boy, sure nothing s exual
Study said ‘erecti on’ already happened, how it’s somehow “not s exual”?
Think, if men, and women both – with a desire – do a ha rassment (touch/ kiss) towards mi nor/ child of their opposite s exes= the men will fastly realize, and admit it “pe do”, but the female will think “she did it out of love, men must more do it in dirty mind”, why? because that what we been taught at “school” right? and you encourage it
If father angry during his travel to Cambodia- his son been touch by a lady, so in his anger, he revenge by touch her daughter back in emotion= sure “only men do it with s exual intention”
Imagine if there’s a cult were men can kiss a babygirl, baby- which most men find NoT s exual, mean big chance men kiss cheek of full dress babygirl is not because of s exual thing, or he just follow a culture, or aka ‘he is victim of culture’ but anti pe do (conservative – rights wing, feminist,& it’s “superhero” dude, crime story youtuber/ influencer, politician, top media ie Bbc) will simply said “it ra pe culture”, “men must be perv, stop victim blaming, period. Castration” (look it’s just a men kiss (full dress) baby at cheek, except if men allow to kiss nu de mi nor). Yet the moment in real life it ‘adult female who can even hand job/ b j nak ed boy’ somehow “O she do it because victim of cult itself”, No, she did it in her pervertness, and hide it in the name of “culture”, she not a victim, she’s a pe do/ female ra pist, and the boy is a Victim of ra pe. Anti pe do alone love to victim blaming if perpe trator is female, and the victim is a boy.
About “how if boy smile?” – I remember feminist told me “there’s a girl who think a men who lick her V is a sign of love/ care, and she like it”, then this feminist said to the girl “you been ra pe, and you must grieving,& crying now”
ReverseOblationRun 