As a blog for satiring sexist unfair ‘cfnm’ (objectification of young men student) oblation run – For year I have vacuum discuss it as a main topic, when I should make it as Main topic often. Here my 2 main memes satire oblation run with evidence, I post it on my reverseoblationrun instagram before went outside city by plane month ago (I just be careful incase something happen= this post exist on my instagram), so Now I present for you, feel free to share,& give credit to my name. This also prove if I post female form= It a representation of protest (not “Hypocrite”, nor “Perv” like hater love to potrait)
As you can see my evidence above,& below that it True there’s a Hypocrisy that Asian Feminine (Modesty) type of Feminist,& it “macho hero” dude, influencer, media, Unicef/ United Nation, and Religious Bigot Apply, I wait for this “Big organisation of gender equality” to speak up which they never does, then seeing them grieve everytime it about tanktop/ bikini issues, then on other day if it young male student frontal naked fest at public institution= relax, laugh, even justify it again..
Yet if we called them out (their hypocrisy) = They’ll (ignorantly) use “whataboutism”, or “Howaboutism” tactic, instead to admit their blatant ‘clear cut’ hypocrisy, and make improvement = “They denial by said they care for both,& no hypocrisy exist here: then blame,& Frame me as somehow I’m not asking equality for men, but just ‘hater’ try to silence female voice (so it frame female victim again, and men as the bad one again), told me to shut up if female victim speak (problem is always female time to speak), told me to just make my own video then they will somehow help” (which they never do, if I tweet, I Rt alone, and even some of them come to my post to mock me), see? after silencing us, they continue their double standard as usual
Bonus a bit, no, it not hypocrite since: 1) this from other country- which have male nudity too. 2) this not held by institution (like oblation run does). 3) It safe, and proven it possible (so to people who falsely accused me as ‘woke’ then said 1/2 naked topless female is impossible, here for you- a bunch of full naked female protest at street, and it Do safe – except if people like you ie religious bigot try to disturb in order to prove your point, lol), And also I need to explain some other point – but it too long, and I know hater will use another bias reasoning trying to debunk me, anyway it for next other post, so I leave it here.
If you pissed, and upset prude feminist because of me censored the pic of naked men, while not censored female nude protest pic which to be remember this is just individual mini blog, then how about me who must anxiety face ‘ton of naked young men student fest’ at public here? which worse held by institution (while at same time witnessing same institution will outcry if it ‘1 female college student in (non nude) bikini at her own indoor room selfie’). Beside in my meme since I saw the comparison is ‘bikini’ vs ‘naked men’ so I censored the men genital, and not knowing I’ll post this ladies protest pic today.
Before entering my main point, let me made this Clear: I’m not here for “attacking” any group of people, nor this about ‘ha te’, I’m here to exercise my Freedom of Speech to speak up Unpopular Taboo issues, that is: How boy face hypocrisy from so called ‘Anti p ae do superhero’ in society, which mean I do raise awareness to protect boy too. Big social media like Youtube/ Facebook/ Instagram (maybe Tiktok too) several time removed my post, or suspend me because either misinterpreted my point, you know unpopular view often seen as “offensive” since more taboo (or maybe behind the authority who review my post is a ‘feminine type of feminist’, or ‘religious dude’ who to be honest dislike my unpopular view since against their narrative believe that ‘only female suffer, only men evil’ bs, which why twisted any of my word that they can twist, the newest was when instagram removed my comment that they twisted as “ha te speech”, just because there’s 1 angry word that I put out of my frustration, in the end of the day: we’re human who can frustrate too don’t we?).
So (living for 30s years at Southeast Asia) I observed how modesty type of feminist, (& it’s “superhero” dude), media i.e Bbc Southeast Asia, politician, and government was very good when campaign & lecture us ‘how men p a ed o should be castra te’ (or strip nak d, or even b*rn alive) without mercy, they will said something sound like “Think about girl trauma, how pa e d o act can be normalize? prove only girl are victim” (when everytime there’s a story of ‘girl victim of men pa e do’= it very easy to viral, media make the news 24/7, almost all of the people angry/ sad, and want to help, which then police & even mr. President alone in action. Which by this: the narrative of “girl victim normalize” alone is debunked).
Media often try their best to campaign female victim (by evil men), sadly ignored male victim (esp if the predator is a female), which I’ll prove by photos below
Yet on the other day they alone (majority of people) celebrate circum cision fest were bunch of an undr age pu ber boy been str ip frontal bottom less at hall without curtain (you think it’s ‘fine’? imagine if reverse: I give you bonus, imagine the girl still wear underwear), most of the cutter must be adult female learner (“Boy should feel Lucky” they said), Inappropriate thing do happened, boy cry (adult female after touching boy then give boy a gift, for boy to stop crying), and all southeast asian female/ mother know it, or see it infront of her own eyes= ‘a normal day’ not even realize their hypocrisy, not realize how it’s a ‘boy victim, and boy trauma’ that been normalize by this ra pe culture, by the way can I castra te Vagina of pae d o adult female (towards boy)? you not even let people str ip her don’t you “Oh even if she seem look like mo lest the boy, the castra tion of vulva/ str ip a pa e do women is a hara ssment understand?”
Another excused was “many boy want it therefore okay”, this is biased, let me put this way, if boy feel uncomfort/ shy will be str ip bottom less during circum cision, fear of s x ual abuse/ geni tal cutting, he cry then see his surrounding act perfectly normal, even encourage him= off course he will think “maybe i’m the 1 whose wrong”, on the other hand I remember prudish feminist told a story about a girl who think she got ‘sign of love’ by adult men who touch her, and this feminist said “You been har ass you know, you should start cry, and grieving”, see?
See? how biased this all, before you excusing “circum is abu se, but it different from pa e d “, don’t lie to yourself I already shown the evidence that ‘innap thing also happened at this circum tradition esp if you let adult female to interact with undr age pu ber boy’ (Funny how anti leftist love to said, when it come to trans toilet: “Oh is that so difficult to understand don’t let men enter female room?”.. yet they alone doesn’t understand that ‘Don’t Let Adult Female to Get Easy Access to Interact With Bottom less Undr age Pu ber Boy at Circum’ *by the way some hypocrite female who enter male toilet can also see, even stare at bunch of peeing men & boy too, since urinal have no door, yes peeing penis + his undie can be seen, even the 1 who try not to look will still see men undie/ male way of peeing, way of men opening his zip.. again since men pee at no door urinoir difficult not to see, and men who uncomfort exist too, like me)
Last I want to satire Oblationrun / Pylon run (Cfnm aka ‘objectification of male student’s bodies’ fest) which was held by F institution University of Philippines at prudish Southeast Asian country by showing them this Cmnf memes.
Five women protest naked inside the Chamber of Deputies on March 08, 2010 in Mexico City demanding the resignation of Mexican President Felipe Calderon in the framnework of the International Women’s day. AFP PHOTO/HO
Another update: at Cambodia they have culture at their rural area were ‘female (mother, grandmother, aunty, nurse, nanny, caretaker) can “touch, or even worse “kiss/ s ucks” an under a ge Boy pe nis/ nu dity’. Study (which some of it writing I shown on meme below) inform many people still thinks ‘an Adult touch/ “kiss” mi nor is not “se xual” (as long as the adult is a female, and the mi nor – who been touch/ s ucks when he nak ed – is a Boy)’ (I add: in which if it is ‘men who touch 1 (full dress) girl waist/ just leg’ will be count as “s exual hara ssment/ s exual”), Another horrible excused they give is “If female touch/ “kiss” under a ge boy nu dity” is must be because “she care/ love Boy”. This is very bias:
They alone already make a ‘conclusion’ on 1st place (that “it will be only ‘s exual’ if men do it to a girl”, or “if adult female do it (s exually ha rassed) to an under a ge boy – we must believe it purely because of “care/ love”). If we want to be objective don’t ever jump to conclusion on 1st place.
Study’s interview show ‘female who said find pe nis attractive’ then took an effort to knee down, pull boy pants, then pull of boy underwear, and – not only touch boy pe nis anymore yet even – s ucks boy pe nis (if photos of illustration I gave on meme is from Cambodia mean: she also want to record it for her sweet memory (or “documentary” as that society will said)). How the F it’s “not s exual” anymore? “O it not s exual haha” said “anti pe do”, or “anti ra pist” mainstream who often lecture us “How you said men touch leg of (full clothed) girl is not s exual?”
If adult female have a dirty mind, she live Cambodia, and she did her creep thing to a boy= she can hide her pervertness in the name of “culture”, and ‘her pe do ness’ been praise as “care”, who knows?
This female never do it to a girl, but always to a boy, sure nothing s exual
Study said ‘erecti on’ already happened, how it’s somehow “not s exual”?
Think, if men, and women both – with a desire – do a ha rassment (touch/ kiss) towards mi nor/ child of their opposite s exes= the men will fastly realize, and admit it “pe do”, but the female will think “she did it out of love, men must more do it in dirty mind”, why? because that what we been taught at “school” right? and you encourage it
If father angry during his travel to Cambodia- his son been touch by a lady, so in his anger, he revenge by touch her daughter back in emotion= sure “only men do it with s exual intention”
Imagine if there’s a cult were men can kiss a babygirl, baby- which most men find NoT s exual, mean big chance men kiss cheek of full dress babygirl is not because of s exual thing, or he just follow a culture, or aka ‘he is victim of culture’ but anti pe do (conservative – rights wing, feminist,& it’s “superhero” dude, crime story youtuber/ influencer, politician, top media ie Bbc) will simply said “it ra pe culture”, “men must be perv, stop victim blaming, period. Castration” (look it’s just a men kiss (full dress) baby at cheek, except if men allow to kiss nu de mi nor). Yet the moment in real life it ‘adult female who can even hand job/ b j nak ed boy’ somehow “O she do it because victim of cult itself”, No, she did it in her pervertness, and hide it in the name of “culture”, she not a victim, she’s a pe do/ female ra pist, and the boy is a Victim of ra pe. Anti pe do alone love to victim blaming if perpe trator is female, and the victim is a boy.
About “how if boy smile?” – I remember feminist told me “there’s a girl who think a men who lick her V is a sign of love/ care, and she like it”, then this feminist said to the girl “you been ra pe, and you must grieving,& crying now”
ReverseOblationRun 