FB REFUSED TO REMOVE TWERKING VIDEO OF MIN0R – EVEN IF IT BARE BUTT BECAUSE THE GENDER IS A BOY (A TYPICAL FROM HYPOCRITE ANTI PAE D0 MAINSTREAM), 8 SEPTEMBER 2023

Facebook reject our report, and kept allowed video of 3 minor boy cry in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes, worse how they claim “O it’s not violated our community guidelines, we are Pro, we hire Pro” Bs:

Facebook policy clearly state that 1) A minor kid genital will be removed even if it’s cover by transparent clothes 2) Even if no private shown but if a minor kid not wear clothes at their upper,& bottom will also be removed 3) A minor kid buttcrack will also be removed. This alone show how facebook (and probably other top media ie Instagram/ Youtube/ Tiktok etc) not being professional by betraying their own policy.

Facebook policy seem only care to protect minor girl Only (and ignorance on an Underage Boy Victim/ Dignity/ modesty), many of fb policy written “this girl’s part”, “that girl’s part”.

Think about this, Fb immediately removed ‘a minor half naked topless girl’, even can removed ‘a 1/3 naked girl’. Fb strictly removed ‘girl in undie’- let alone ‘girl’s buttcrack’.. even fb can strictly removed girl in full clothes dance just because they perceived it “se xual”, okay By thisThen How The f Fb relax allowed video of an underage boy – three minor boy, in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes during circumcision (a pseudo science practice that normalize boy se xual abuse) vid!? Hellooo

Yeah after this blatant unfairness against boy, that mainstream “anti ped0”, and “anti woke” i.e puritan feminist,& it “hero” dude, influencer, top media, United Nation still push narration “Why always only happened to girl?” and if I critic their hypocrisy = “O whataboutism again, we are fair- but boy voice (on reply section) silence, now time for girl voice (on every video from big influencer channel,& all top organization media againnn)”

Facebook also refused to removed video of ‘an underage boy who pull his pants down – exposed his minor boy buttcrack, and Twerking after adult female gave him a gesture sign to do so’. I remember when every Anti ped0 mainstream said “Twerk in dress must be count as se xual” when justify Fb, or any other media removed girl dance video, even angry when I questioned “How about sumo? Minor teen boy almost naked (with sexy mawashi only) wrestling in butt pop up style position [*which do 99% similar, or if not – it’s male nudity that been more exposed]= this people excused “well no twerk haha”. Now a video of boy pull his short shown his minor buttcrack, and Twerk after adult female told him= Fb, and this mainstream “Anti ped0, anti woke” together in their Hypocrisy mislead us to believe “It not se xual” by act blind, worse they even not shame to display their hypocrisy.

I almost think if they doesn’t care on ‘exploitation of boy at sumo, atleast they will remove boy in dress twerking’ right? Because it what they state when attacking me with “O howaboutism again” – yet now they even relax boy without shorts twerk his bare buttcrack, not care to outrage like they did if happen to girl, and even not shame with their hypocrisy.

*This is why you must understand how angry I’m with this nudity inequality, and hypocrisy- that always make justification if it objectified male even teen boy nudity (when they alone outrage crazily if it happen to female), how lot of courage I took to spoke up about male dignity/ boy modesty, how many mental it take to received ignorance, ridicule and insult, and yet still need to kept to talk diplomatically, you don’t know how many anxiety I face during raising awareness, or met new hypocrisy again… for almost 10s year, without significant change in society, even worse now rather than they admit their hypocrisy, in their ignorance they start to use “O whataboutism again” tactic to silence us… so don’t get mad if now I start my own world Cmnf project- I couldn’t force you, and you couldn’t dictate me too then.

WHATABOUTISM DO NECESSARRY TO EXPOSED PURITAN FEMINIST,& IT “HERO” DUDE INFLUENCER’S HYPOCRISY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2023

Now I want to counter “O whataboutism again”- a feminine feminism (& it “hero” dude), religious bigot, and right wing/ conservative influencer tactic to hide feminist hypocrisy, and even worse they have audacity to mislead our intention (which is pure questioning why they apply obvious hypocrisy- which by that hope for male,& boy victim to be more fairly acknowledge by media) as somehow we who ask “how about” are the one who have “bad intention against female victim” (which by this portrait them as “more victim” at the same time): when reality they are the 1 who’s hypocrite, and try to silence/ shaming male,& boy victim voice. Mainstream do believe this cliché, and ask me “why you must whine about male/ boy victim every time on female victim video, huh!? You must be a women hater! You not helping boy! Prove female voice difficult to be heard!” Bs, okay, here is my answer:

1. Sure, when ton of other comment on same video talk about other different metoo case= this same people have no problem at all, perfectly fine- even glorified it. The moment I talk ‘mentoo’ this people immediately gather to attack this one person- who talk about male,& even boy victim “O whataboutism again, look we are fair, but men or boy victim silence, now our female time to speak up (yeah always female time), just complain on your own platform! (my 11 follower Instagram?), and we will help (which they never does)”

2. The reason I ask “how about men?” is simple: I always observed how top media only talk/ post/ upload video about ‘female victim (esp by men perpetrator)’ they maximalize the victimhood of female, and the evilness of male, update the news everyday, push society to kept pressure court til heavy punishment is given, and kept whining even if the case already over. The moment it male or boy victim case= relax, silence even if the case still viral (the news only brought by non feminist media*), or if they in a rare moment bring it up (mostly if it male victim with male perpetrator- not the female perpetrator one) they will try to minimize the victimhood of male/ boy victim,& minimize the evilness of female perpetrator. I do make video/ tweet on my own platform but ‘I tweet= I Rt alone’ even some from their side just come to mock me, or said “they doesn’t get it why I make a big deal if female touch men nip? It not genital penis” (said the same people who complain if men touch female waist, or leg, or hand “O stop normalize men who whistling to female, it rape! Stop normalizing it”), so the effective way to gain attention + make people aware their hypocrisy is to speak when this hypocrite whinning on vid/ post of female victim case, get it?

3. Look female victim have been supported strongly by top media, feminist media, conservative influencer, right wing politician (inc left one to be honest) who will by default make ton of video if it ‘female victim by men perv’ case (they never talk/ atleast very rarely talk about male, or boy victim especially by female predator), even more every mainstream netizen also support female victim voice by brought up ‘female victim’ story on comment section all the time. We men, and boy case doesn’t have that privilege yet still the moment I only post one or two comment about men issues on reply section (which hidden between thousand of other comment)= they then try to shame, and silence us without give us chance to have voice! But surely “O it always female voice that difficult to be heard because block by howaboutism dude”

4. I never heard on any other topic were people said “stop talking (what not suit our agenda), just talk at your own room!” only at feminist discussion this become trend (I guess since feminist kept got exposed on their double standard so they start creating this “stop howaboutism” tactic)

5. Feminine feminist told us to talk only at our own platform, when they alone kept tag other people at Instagram, promote advert of their movement/ female case, put poster of their cause at public facilities, make a huge demonstration, and tantrum on the street Ie Spain Kissgate case, how if I tell them to just speak up on their own room/ office? by the way below when katy perry pinch 20yo young male nip twice without consent at live stage= female cheerz together, if anti whataboutism claim they are fair- then why no same rage like “Spain kissgate” case?

6. Even worse if I speak on our platform ie our own channel at youtube/ tiktok/ fb/ Instagram= this tiktok,& “America tiktok” try to shut me down!

7. Feminine feminism alone when they protest unfairness towards women= they alone often said “Why this Muslim have discussion about men allowed to marry 4 female? How about women marry several men?” every “O howabout again” dude silence, the moment we ask “Why feminist whine fgm only while ignored mgm/ circumcision at Muslim society?”= “O whataboutism again, look we are fair, but we will (shamelessly) said mgm is perfectly okay, fgm is harm, learn (pseudo) science plz, ahaha”

8. Also sometime “O howaboutism again” by Feminist,& it “macho” dude is ludicrous when I question the newest case of boy victim on old youtube video about 1970 case of female being harassed= still the answer is “O whataboutism again, we fair but boy victim silence, now time for this female victim (at 1970) case”. Another is they use “O Howaboutism again” to shame us for bringing boy victim, and told us to now focus on case like ‘female being whistles by men’.

Here 2 example of word of people who arguing me, and what my answer is:

1. “O whatabout (again) *clown meme*, how about you record documentary about this boy, this one is about her”

Answer: Do you said the same when on same comment section many other female talk about other case of female victim story? If I make my own video (or post on other men issues platform) usually almost no/ less viewer- it need extra help by comment on place were our voice can be more heard. “O this 1 is for her” only in feminist world we can hear this cliché “we are fair but men,& boy shut up, this time is for her .. O and other case of female victim story” (read: metoo yes, mentoo shut the f up, but we are fair!”

2. “how is what you are saying make her story less potential? The way you claim her story to be a “rumour” is just disgusting. Don’t pretend to care about that boy- if you did you wouldn’t bring it up when another victim is speaking”

Answer: Look about “rumour” that s/he try to frame me- It’s not about downplay her voice, English is not my mother tongue basically I only ask “Hei you all already grieve if it female victim case even if she couldn’t prove the evidence being touch, then why when on other day, you all see infront of your own eyes ‘nurse photos/ selfie/ touch naked minor boy in an innap way at public= you all relax, even laugh,& try to justified it by mantra word ‘circumcision?’ “ So I care about boy that’s why I speak up on place were my voice for boy can be easily been gain attention, and place were mainstream will notice their hypocrisy (if at our own platform- I tweet I Rt alone, or you doesn’t get it “what a deal if katty perry touch men nip? It not genital, it not penis haha” (said same people who outrage if ‘men touch female leg, or just whistle’, and want to jail them). It you who try to downplay boy victim voice (look I talk about boy victim- s/he doesn’t even care, and just try to shaming me, busy to mislead other as somehow “I try to silence female voice”. By saying “you not try to help boy” you alone downplay boy victim, and wonder when I said you’re hypocrite). Okay after shaming me,& mislead other to perceived me as the bad 1 for speak of boy victim voice- then will you on next day will give the same effort speak on boy? Or just hypocrite like yeSterday? Relax seeing ‘female nurse photo,& touch minor boy in an innap way at public circumcision’, be honest, you Don’t (prove me wrong).

OBLATIONRUN/ PYLON RUN MAKE ME DO THIS…, 4 DECEMBER 2021

Alpha phi omega, and universtiy of Philippines, you push me to do this…

The Irony – How Southeast Asian Feminine Type Feminist, and Mother who very Talented when Grieving &Whine “Castra tion” of Suspected ‘Men Pa e do’ (just by hear a story), yet very relax even if seeing ‘Adult Female Touch Boy inappropriately’ (infront of her own eyes), 17 October 2021

Before entering my main point, let me made this Clear: I’m not here for “attacking” any group of people, nor this about ‘ha te’, I’m here to exercise my Freedom of Speech to speak up Unpopular Taboo issues, that is: How boy face hypocrisy from so called ‘Anti p ae do superhero’ in society, which mean I do raise awareness to protect boy too. Big social media like Youtube/ Facebook/ Instagram (maybe Tiktok too) several time removed my post, or suspend me because either misinterpreted my point, you know unpopular view often seen as “offensive” since more taboo (or maybe behind the authority who review my post is a ‘feminine type of feminist’, or ‘religious dude’ who to be honest dislike my unpopular view since against their narrative believe that ‘only female suffer, only men evil’ bs, which why twisted any of my word that they can twist, the newest was when instagram removed my comment that they twisted as “ha te speech”, just because there’s 1 angry word that I put out of my frustration, in the end of the day: we’re human who can frustrate too don’t we?).

So (living for 30s years at Southeast Asia) I observed how modesty type of feminist, (& it’s “superhero” dude), media i.e Bbc Southeast Asia, politician, and government was very good when campaign & lecture us ‘how men p a ed o should be castra te’ (or strip nak d, or even b*rn alive) without mercy, they will said something sound like “Think about girl trauma, how pa e d o act can be normalize? prove only girl are victim” (when everytime there’s a story of ‘girl victim of men pa e do’= it very easy to viral, media make the news 24/7, almost all of the people angry/ sad, and want to help, which then police & even mr. President alone in action. Which by this: the narrative of “girl victim normalize” alone is debunked).

Media often try their best to campaign female victim (by evil men), sadly ignored male victim (esp if the predator is a female), which I’ll prove by photos below

Yet on the other day they alone (majority of people) celebrate circum cision fest were bunch of an undr age pu ber boy been str ip frontal bottom less at hall without curtain (you think it’s ‘fine’? imagine if reverse: I give you bonus, imagine the girl still wear underwear), most of the cutter must be adult female learner (“Boy should feel Lucky” they said), Inappropriate thing do happened, boy cry (adult female after touching boy then give boy a gift, for boy to stop crying), and all southeast asian female/ mother know it, or see it infront of her own eyes= ‘a normal day’ not even realize their hypocrisy, not realize how it’s a ‘boy victim, and boy trauma’ that been normalize by this ra pe culture, by the way can I castra te Vagina of pae d o adult female (towards boy)? you not even let people str ip her don’t you “Oh even if she seem look like mo lest the boy, the castra tion of vulva/ str ip a pa e do women is a hara ssment understand?”

Another excused was “many boy want it therefore okay”, this is biased, let me put this way, if boy feel uncomfort/ shy will be str ip bottom less during circum cision, fear of s x ual abuse/ geni tal cutting, he cry then see his surrounding act perfectly normal, even encourage him= off course he will think “maybe i’m the 1 whose wrong”, on the other hand I remember prudish feminist told a story about a girl who think she got ‘sign of love’ by adult men who touch her, and this feminist said “You been har ass you know, you should start cry, and grieving”, see?

See? how biased this all, before you excusing “circum is abu se, but it different from pa e d “, don’t lie to yourself I already shown the evidence that ‘innap thing also happened at this circum tradition esp if you let adult female to interact with undr age pu ber boy’ (Funny how anti leftist love to said, when it come to trans toilet: “Oh is that so difficult to understand don’t let men enter female room?”.. yet they alone doesn’t understand that ‘Don’t Let Adult Female to Get Easy Access to Interact With Bottom less Undr age Pu ber Boy at Circum’ *by the way some hypocrite female who enter male toilet can also see, even stare at bunch of peeing men & boy too, since urinal have no door, yes peeing penis + his undie can be seen, even the 1 who try not to look will still see men undie/ male way of peeing, way of men opening his zip.. again since men pee at no door urinoir difficult not to see, and men who uncomfort exist too, like me)

Last I want to satire Oblationrun / Pylon run (Cfnm aka ‘objectification of male student’s bodies’ fest) which was held by F institution University of Philippines at prudish Southeast Asian country by showing them this Cmnf memes.

Five women protest naked inside the Chamber of Deputies on March 08, 2010 in Mexico City demanding the resignation of Mexican President Felipe Calderon in the framnework of the International Women’s day. AFP PHOTO/HO

Another update: at Cambodia they have culture at their rural area were ‘female (mother, grandmother, aunty, nurse, nanny, caretaker) can “touch, or even worse “kiss/ s ucks” an under a ge Boy pe nis/ nu dity’. Study (which some of it writing I shown on meme below) inform many people still thinks ‘an Adult touch/ “kiss” mi nor is not “se xual” (as long as the adult is a female, and the mi nor – who been touch/ s ucks when he nak ed – is a Boy)’ (I add: in which if it is ‘men who touch 1 (full dress) girl waist/ just leg’ will be count as “s exual hara ssment/ s exual”), Another horrible excused they give is “If female touch/ “kiss” under a ge boy nu dity” is must be because “she care/ love Boy”. This is very bias:

1. They alone already make a ‘conclusion’ on 1st place (that “it will be only ‘s exual’ if men do it to a girl”, or “if adult female do it (s exually ha rassed) to an under a ge boy – we must believe it purely because of “care/ love”). If we want to be objective don’t ever jump to conclusion on 1st place.
2. Study’s interview show ‘female who said find pe nis attractive’ then took an effort to knee down, pull boy pants, then pull of boy underwear, and – not only touch boy pe nis anymore yet even – s ucks boy pe nis (if photos of illustration I gave on meme is from Cambodia mean: she also want to record it for her sweet memory (or “documentary” as that society will said)). How the F it’s “not s exual” anymore? “O it not s exual haha” said “anti pe do”, or “anti ra pist” mainstream who often lecture us “How you said men touch leg of (full clothed) girl is not s exual?”
3. If adult female have a dirty mind, she live Cambodia, and she did her creep thing to a boy= she can hide her pervertness in the name of “culture”, and ‘her pe do ness’ been praise as “care”, who knows?
4. This female never do it to a girl, but always to a boy, sure nothing s exual
5. Study said ‘erecti on’ already happened, how it’s somehow “not s exual”?
6. Think, if men, and women both – with a desire – do a ha rassment (touch/ kiss) towards mi nor/ child of their opposite s exes= the men will fastly realize, and admit it “pe do”, but the female will think “she did it out of love, men must more do it in dirty mind”, why? because that what we been taught at “school” right? and you encourage it
7. If father angry during his travel to Cambodia- his son been touch by a lady, so in his anger, he revenge by touch her daughter back in emotion= sure “only men do it with s exual intention”
8. Imagine if there’s a cult were men can kiss a babygirl, baby- which most men find NoT s exual, mean big chance men kiss cheek of full dress babygirl is not because of s exual thing, or he just follow a culture, or aka ‘he is victim of culture’ but anti pe do (conservative – rights wing, feminist,& it’s “superhero” dude, crime story youtuber/ influencer, politician, top media ie Bbc) will simply said “it ra pe culture”, “men must be perv, stop victim blaming, period. Castration” (look it’s just a men kiss (full dress) baby at cheek, except if men allow to kiss nu de mi nor). Yet the moment in real life it ‘adult female who can even hand job/ b j nak ed boy’ somehow “O she do it because victim of cult itself”, No, she did it in her pervertness, and hide it in the name of “culture”, she not a victim, she’s a pe do/ female ra pist, and the boy is a Victim of ra pe. Anti pe do alone love to victim blaming if perpe trator is female, and the victim is a boy.
9. About “how if boy smile?” – I remember feminist told me “there’s a girl who think a men who lick her V is a sign of love/ care, and she like it”, then this feminist said to the girl “you been ra pe, and you must grieving,& crying now”

Stop kriit now

“O only female nudity been objectified at public” = is a myth. More male nudity been ‘objectified’ either more frontally, or more fam rating, or more easily happen at crowded public at Asia. 18 April 2020

Hi All, I realize that mainstream of people often difficult to be ‘one tone’ with my movement who active in protesting ‘Why only male nudity that been objectified in more frontal way, or in more family rating way if at legal scene/ public’ – one of them is because they have a believe (perception) that “female public nudity more easy to happened therefore only women bodies are objectified” – which is completely biased (I know at Europe we easy to find female nudity but at same society they easily to have public male nudity too – said Wnbr were you can see naked female but the men naked too at public right?). What I want to focus is mostly on Asia region (especially Southeast Asia) were I bold to said that society claim of ‘only female nudity that been objectified’ is a Myth, the right one is (again): ‘only male nudity that been objectified in more frontal way, or in more family rating way if at legal scene/ public – mostly if at Asia’ (Also some cult at West country probably have some place were male nudity been more dominated too), & also I’m talking in this nowadays era.

So here’s my back up:

1. Asia (atleast Southeast Asia) Society tend to over caring female modesty only if at public.

Asian bystander will ‘only protect/ cover in rush if it’s female who (even just) partial naked at street (even if she did it willingly)- let alone full naked female. But they less care to protect male modesty even if he naked at street (let alone just a semi naked guy).

2. Southeast Asian often only dare to stripped male criminal only at public (if he catched red handed)

If there’s a male thief who steal just a ‘less worth thing’ like ‘chicken at village’- he can still be beaten harshly by iron, stripped semi naked/ even frontal naked, worse burn alive publicly (let alone if he do big criminal), Yet even a female pedophile (on boy victim) will just got ‘anger shout’ by mob (so let alone if she just steal at market).

By the way female can feel free to beat up male thief, shout for him to be burn alive, or even share a photos, or video of naked men thief beaten in blood at public on facebook for her own satisfication (imagine if reverse – it’s a Southeast Asian men who beat semi naked female thief, and share publicly at Fb.. you know what happen so double standard.. hypocrisy).

3. Male nudity can exist at ‘fam rating crowded public place’ at Asia

Only male frontal nudity (or at least almost naked male – who exposed his full buttcrack) who can been exposed at legal entertainment/ crowded ‘fam- rating’ public place at Asia (I never see the reverse situation, usually female nudity only done individually by exhibitionist, & at non-crowded area, or once exist but already extinct since mainstream got upset/ outrage).

A. Tattoo contest at legal crowded area were ‘only male almost naked show his full buttcrack’.

Why? because female nudity do more taboo at Asia.

B. ‘(Bunch of) male (almost) naked only’ dance entertainment at Wedding party.

If male who naked dance = “atleast his penis couldn’t be seen, case close haha” (yeah see above photos were male not coincidentally show his genital & female audience started laugh hard).

If it’s a female who naked dance = “Omg objectification of female, she already full naked, you know she can wardrobe malfunction & show her vagina right!? look her buttcrack already been exposed, banned!”, or, “why only happen to female? I’ll try my best to challenge it” (*This is kind of a comment that I always face, some screenshot by me), like this below:

You now excusing “well, Asia female will also angry if male nudity happen publicly”- bullshit, evidence of southeast asia female’s hypocrisy can be seen in pictures below: how thousand of female click ‘like’ button on news at instagram – when it’s about ‘male who exposed himself naked at legal court’ (I even have screenshot of many female who show support comment when it’s ‘male nudity only’ who been exposed at legal court).

C. Male nudity at Legal court at ‘religious prudish country’

Show me a case were “female naked at legal court in prudish religious country in Asia”? by the way this ‘instagram screenshot’ inside pic below (were many female & male click “like”) is evidence showing that ‘mainstream of people perfectly fine if it’s (objectification of) male public nudity- even if it already at court, at religious country’.

D. (Young) Male student naked show only at High school Graduation day

If you claim “always female nudity”, then show me case were only female student who dance semi nude at high school in Asia, can you?

Society will excused – if it objectification of male semi nudity at this nude fan dance – “O why so serious? at least his penis will not be seen haha” (even if wardrobe malfunction do can happen & show accidentally his ‘virgin student’ penis), yeah imagine if the sexes were switch it’s a female high school student only who dance nude = “Omg how can fully naked women dance at graduation day!? her butt crack can be seen! how if she wardrobe malfunction and show her vagina? it’s at high school for God sake”

E. The Contrast & Frontal one

Here show frontal objectification of male full nudity also happening at Crowded Public in Asia (Southeast Asia).

This two worse unfair ‘contrast’ Cfnm at South Asia i.e Holy bath at India, and oblation/ pylon run at Philippines (both case bunch of young male only who full nude, and kid & teen can watch legally).

It very contrast like at oblation run: ‘female can see not only male with his undie anymore, yet even a puber girl audience can see (bunch of young) male full frontal naked at public (worse institution)’ vs ‘male not (even) see (just) 1/4 naked female – she even full clothed (so let alone ‘see her partial nudity’ at institution).

This happen at prudish religious country who claim more modest than West.

Worse 1 of them is held by legal institution (at prudish Southeast Asia) who always lecturing us to “stop objectify women”.

Below pic- on the right is unfair oblation run (you can compare how Southeast Asian female react if ‘it’s female form’ vs if ‘it’s male form’)

*** sometime at oblation run, they hidden (ly) include Underage nude male student run streak (who knows)

4. Teen (puber) boy nudity more “family rating”

We all know how outrage mainstream are over (just only) teen puber girl ‘upper’ half nudity, right? “Omg! her puber breast can be seen by men, jail all the 1 who responsible for this!” (let alone if the girl bottomless)

but off course if the gender were reverse – a teen puber boy (even if he already fully naked/ bottomless at public indoor, worse already exposed his puber erect) = Everybody pretend it’s a “normal” day (include modesty type of feminine feminist, politician, legal media, cyber police you name it).

5. Only Asian Female who can Grab Penis of naked men publicly & got away with it

The reverse situation would be f*cking offensive

Asian girl couldn’t resist – when they come to Europe – to took selfie with naked men at public, even dare to grab penis during public selfie (we as Asian guy often afraid to do the reverse situation ‘grab pussy of nude female publicly’, since we know how anger Asia feminism will be).

Yes there do exist some feminine type of female who think their gender “win” if only ‘her modesty protected’, or ‘revenge objectification’ (even if objectification of naked male bodies already exist long time before her great grandmother were born).

Bonus screenshot below (to Compared yourself with above photos), below: A young Asian female (who live probably at Malay) loose her mind at chat over (just only) idea of “female half nudity” (aka ‘male & female can see each other opposite sex’s upper part equally’) so let alone if “female full frontal naked” (/ Cmnf idea right?), but if you compare (by look at above photos) since (above) it’s about Cfnm (even if already truly exist like evidence above) = suddenly that anger’s from Asian prudish feminism ‘thrown out of a windows’ (yet if you see below pic- look how angry she is over just idea of ‘female partial nudity’).

Actually she (screenshot below) also already angry over just bikini idea at f*cking swimming pool on prudish country. You see? O how hypocrite feminine (modesty type of) feminism can be (so support only body confidence feminist).

6. [Yup this number six just about male semi nudity but] Only okay if men & teen boy wear almost naked custom at legal sport in Asia, just because of mantra word “sumo”

The reverse would be problematic if at Asia legal sport right?

You can said there’s other sport were female show more skin, yes, but it not so contrast as sumo 1 you know? (male can still topless/ wear speedo there, and female not ‘almost naked’ like sumo – at the sport example you mentioned right?)

More

7. Western edition

A. A guy naked at Airport= normal day, A female naked at Airport= Problematic

B. ‘Male naked pan show’ at West got talent (usually female only till bikini- not almost naked at this kind of show, even that already problematic enough).

8. Reminder: penis=VAGINA (Deal with it)

Stop tricky comparison by comparing female partial nudity with full frontal naked men for your own agenda, hypocrite.

Conclusion: I win, and you lose

“Female nudity more common” = IS A MYTH, It’s Male Nudity who been ‘Objectified’ in more Frontal Way, or more Fam Rating, or more easily happen at Crowded Area in Asia society. Sorry feminine (modesty type of) feminist, and exhibitionist guy you couldn’t lie for your narrative agenda anymore.

O SHARE THIS ARTICLE to the Rest of the WORLD.

 

Oblation Run 2020: The Great Oblation Run, Run for the Future- A Call for Climate Action (Palma hall by Alpha Phi Omega), 21 February 2020

Today that “Objectification of Male Frontal Nudity” Oblation run will be held again at f*cking legal institution (University of Philippines) in prudish Southeast Asia country (the region were modesty feminist, politician, & the education system often busy lecturing us men about “stop objectification of female in bikini”). Here’s the best link of me protesting oblation run: https://reverseoblationrun.wordpress.com/2018/11/26/oblation-run-2018-2019-still-sucks-always-tons-of-male-nudity-that-been-objectified-frontally-at-public-even-held-by-asia-institution-every-fucking-year-from-1970s-before-femi/ and this too: https://reverseoblationrun.wordpress.com/here-is-the-start-demand-true-equality-in-oblation-run-my-vision/

By the way I want to show you an email from a guy (let call him “J”) who also frustrated by unfairness of oblation run .. but we all are just ‘minority of minority’ (nobody care even if already bunch of young male been objectified frontally naked at legal institution in prudish Southeast Asia, but yes everybody – especially hejabi & modesty feminist – care about “objectification of female in Bikini at beach in the West” soooo much, till they make awareness on internet “how bikini & cleavage of [clothed] female in West must be objectification” even Global campaign to have burqini- to softly get rid bikini at pool [but not men speedo], right mainstream who support it? “O how crime it’s female shown in bikini, right!?” … or when that religious fanatic & authority condemn tiny bikini at beach on Boracay “O we don’t care if she wear it by herself, innap! you must follow the policy, world are near the end because of cancer name body confidence feminist, forced her to cover now so society learn!”). Okay aside from my satire a while, let read/ look what “J”‘s point of view on this sexist oblation run / pylon run towards male, below:

“Anyway, thanks for all the work you do about the Oblation Run. It still angers me, the double standards and hypocrisy of the feminist movement. As I’ve said before if this situation were reversed, there would be a public outcry and I can assure you every feminist in North America would be taking to the TV or their websites and organizing public campaigns to force the government here to protest to the Philippines government to intervene and stop this public abuse and humiliation of women by men – and these are exactly the same people who object to first world countries dictating their standards of social behaviour to the developing world! Yet when it comes to the feminist agenda, interfering in foreign countries is considered not merely acceptable but actually necessary!! The hypocrisy and double-standards of the west are there for everyone with an open and honest mind to see.  

Look at this….

Can you imagine if a middle aged man at an event where teenage females were obliged to expose themselves in public quite openly took pictures – and even more, it appears that she is directing them to pose!! She can go home happy that she has good quality photos that show in detail the most private parts of these poor guy’s anatomy. She is wearing one of the of the fraternity’s t-shirts too, perhaps she is an “organizer” for the Oblation Run. Again what would happen if a load of guys joined a women’s social club and organized the younger female members into exposing themselves in public?  I can promise you that in the west, there would certainly be a police investigation and they would probably get arrested. Reverse the situation and it is perfectly fine! In fact, they would praise her and say she is working for equal rights!!  I get really angry, thinking of this female (who like oblation run) can relaxing at home, going through all the pictures naked bodies of these young college men. This is complete domination, we can do nothing to stop her. But of course the feminists consider her a “victim” and in need of more rights and power!!!!

This looks like it may be one of the pictures she took…

Which very easy to be zoom

In your message and posts before you mentioned that private parts are not analogous (penis does not equal breast). This is very true and I have touched on the subject before. A man’s penis equals a woman’s vagina and so the equivalent for a female Oblation Run would actually be an event where the the female’s vagina is on show. Which of course does not happen, for example if a woman is in a standing position and especially if she has not shaved her pubes then her genitals are not visible. Yes, she like the males is naked and vulnerable, but for the man it is to a different degree. As the woman’s vagina is not actually on show yet at the Oblation Run the penis and balls can be seen by all the spectators. Also the head of the penis in males equals the clitoris in women. If there were naked woman at a protest, would the clitoris be visible? Of course not. Yet because this event takes place in the Philippines and all the participants are circumcised, the head of each boy’s penis can be seen by everyone – this is the most private part of his body, but here it is on public exhibition with hundreds of women and girls. Can you seriously tell me you could expect a similar event taking place for girls? Female University students being organized by men into an event where they have to strip naked and display their clitoris in public as almost thousands of men at University? 

Which reminds me, as the photographic quality of even basic phones improves over time, the clarity of the pictures has reached the point where every detail is visible and can be instantly posted online for the whole world to see.

Even the fact that this guy has had a Philippine style circumcision can be seen and discussed by his fellow students, acquaintances, total strangers who attended this event and now women all over the world

His residual foreskin is clearly visible and can be commented upon by all who present…

And at online (as this picture that I easily found was) so anybody everywhere can discuss his circumcision. Comparing the Philippine style where some foreskin is left hanging on the underside of the penis, as different to the western style where all the skin covereign the head of the penis is completely removed. 

Though this would be the equivalent of a woman with her legs spread wide open, her clitoris on full view is shown to everyone and anyone, those present and online viewers…..this would never happen on Southeast Asia university on the first place (even just bra top already problematic if at Asia public univ.. let alone half naked, I mean naked female)

yet we are told that women need more rights? Where are the rights for male who disagree to complain? And yet the whole Oblation Run is a public spectacle and  a cause for laughter and humour at the expense of males who, we are regularly assured by the mass media, are making women their victims!! 

Enjoying yourself? If these gender roles were reversed, you would be described as a pervert, every feminist would hate you and maybe even the police would be investigating. But you just showed up for the political protest (!) Yeah of course you did.   

Anyway, that’s all for now.

All the best,

J”

*Anyway before you all modesty feminist give excused, I’m sorry all of your excused already been debunk at the 1st link I gave above.. or here again: https://reverseoblationrun.wordpress.com/2018/11/26/oblation-run-2018-2019-still-sucks-always-tons-of-male-nudity-that-been-objectified-frontally-at-public-even-held-by-asia-institution-every-fucking-year-from-1970s-before-femi/

**If you are a guy (or even a body confidence girl) who been sick & tired by this oblation run (pylon run) unfairness & hypocrisy: Contact me now & we can be a tag team!

 

 

Tracy Brabin Mp – Mainstream lose mind over shoulder? 5 February 2020

You know why I’m seem ‘passionate’ (a.k.a obsessed) mentioning (complain) double standard of ‘why always male form that been “objectified” more frontally/ more fam rating at public- yet the reverse often big deal’? because beside this double standard itself is unfair (to male modesty), I often observed since kid for example: if at formal place there’s a female who dress bit reveal a skin (remember she still f*cking clothes- top & bottom + wear double layer- bra & undie) this mainstream (mostly exhibitionist guy, modesty type of feminist, hejabi feminist, religious guy, and Pc cult media) become very ‘rigid’ like a robot “Omg a clothed female (just) show bit of skin – the girl show her shoulder (not even yet a – non big deal – stomach, okay!? just shoulder), O why men covered his shoulder!? we must forced equality!” something like that right (like this pic below the newest example: Tracy Brabin case, *also remember this is at Liberal – far less prudish – West country).

Yet when the sexes were reverse for i.e a male who change clothes (topless) inside parliament building, or an important person in my country (men) wear just short at legal interview (*in Prudish religious country)- this kind of mainstream suddenly become ‘flexible’ “For f*ck sake, you complain if he just topless for a while inside building? he’s not even naked!”, or “Mind ur own business, you couldn’t forced if he want to wear short, or not, it’s his rights! learn! get deal! hahaha”

You see? other worse example – they sensitive everytime it’s a female who *bit* more reveal, but they don’t angry if at *public legal sport* only the men & teen boy who been exposed wear undie only (yet the female one full clothes- contrast) like Sumo “Haha, be flexible it must be count as cult, except if it’s female who more reveal- it definitely not a cult, or a cult that need to be change, haha”.

Now, I know some of you said “parliament and public legal sport is different, morons!”, but just imagine if at sumo- it’s the female who wear mawashi/ fundoshi only, while Tracy Brabin is a men= suddenly “well he show shoulder, so what? the female who been exposed at legal sport is the 1 we must care! why only happen to female blabla”, right, hypocrite? you based by gender, sexist but doesn’t even realize it.

So feminine (modesty type of) feminist can shame men for seeing just bit of female skin- make us men feel guilty, then she play “objectification” victim card af, while they alone feel free to admire men form (/ at least like laugh at man boobs/ at least can see men form without need to feel taboo), and I as men couldn’t said ‘men got objectified too’ for every exact same situation that make feminist outrage if it happen to female? off course the stats of female “objectification” inflate since every bit of skin= “Objectification!”.

O yeah even at *legal formal institution* in Prudish Religious Southeast Asia- a bunch of young men can even objectified himself frontally naked at street public university- let alone just a guy changing shirt at parliament, or an important person (men) wear short for tv interview.

 

Here below just a pic gift from me to hypocrite feminine (modesty type of) feminism, religious bigot, media, and the rest of hypocrite mainstream.. a photos of female form in non sexual context *at indoor, non legal, non crowded place*- so yes I’m not hypocrite.

Bonus male chest= breast, while penis=VAGINA

CHINA THANK YOU FOR THE EXISTANCE OF CMNF (SINCE TIRED OF CFNM/ MALE OBJECTIFICATION AT PUBLIC BY OTHER ASIAN COUNTRY), AND MERRY X MAS & HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020, 27 DECEMBER 2019

THANK YOU CHINA – WE (MALE) ALREADY TIRED WITH OTHER ASIA COUNTRY WHO ONLY DARE TO EXPOSED MALE (OR EVEN TEEN BOY) NUDITY (ONLY) AT PUBLIC FAM RATING PLACE – BY THIS FEMALE FORM IN NON SEXUAL CONTEXT AT PUBLIC, WE FEEL JUSTICE! WE ADMIRE FEMALE FORM, AND DON’T LISTEN TO OTHER ASIA/ U.S/ MEDIA/ FEMININE (MODESTY) TYPE OF FEMINIST PROPAGANDA (SINCE THEY ALONE NEVER CARE EVERY TIME MALE NUDITY BEEN OBJECTIFIED PUBLICLY/ AT MOVIE  LEGALLY)

IF YOU ASK ME “WHERE’S THE EVIDENCE MALE NUDITY BEEN EXPLOIT PUBLICLY/ LEGALLY AT MOVIE!?” – CHALLENGE ACCEPTED, READ FULLY MY BLOG & YOU’LL EASILY FOUND IT

(BY THE WAY DON’T COUNT THE FEMALE EXHIBITIONIST FORM PHOTOS THAT ILLEGALLY TAKEN OR FEMALE FORM AT INDOOR NON PUBLIC PLACE- SINCE IT NOT APPLE TO APPLE).

MERRY CHRISTMAS 2019 & HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020

CHINA THANK YOU FOR THE EXISTANCE OF CMNF (SINCE TIRED OF CFNM/ MALE OBJECTIFICATION AT PUBLIC BY OTHER ASIAN COUNTRY), AND MERRY X MAS & HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020, 27 DECEMBER 2019

THANK YOU CHINA – WE (MALE) ALREADY TIRED WITH OTHER ASIA COUNTRY WHO ONLY DARE TO EXPOSED MALE (OR EVEN TEEN BOY) NUDITY (ONLY) AT PUBLIC FAM RATING PLACE – BY THIS FEMALE FORM IN NON SEXUAL CONTEXT AT PUBLIC, WE FEEL JUSTICE! WE ADMIRE FEMALE FORM, AND DON’T LISTEN TO OTHER ASIA/ U.S/ MEDIA/ FEMININE (MODESTY) TYPE OF FEMINIST PROPAGANDA (SINCE THEY ALONE NEVER CARE EVERY TIME MALE NUDITY BEEN OBJECTIFIED PUBLICLY/ AT MOVIE  LEGALLY)

IF YOU ASK ME “WHERE’S THE EVIDENCE MALE NUDITY BEEN EXPLOIT PUBLICLY/ LEGALLY AT MOVIE!?” – CHALLENGE ACCEPTED, READ FULLY MY BLOG & YOU’LL EASILY FOUND IT

(BY THE WAY DON’T COUNT THE FEMALE EXHIBITIONIST FORM PHOTOS THAT ILLEGALLY TAKEN OR FEMALE FORM AT INDOOR NON PUBLIC PLACE- SINCE IT NOT APPLE TO APPLE).

MERRY CHRISTMAS 2019 & HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020

Imagine (If Asian & American Mentality can finally understand that breast =/=(male) genital (*penis= VAGINA)), 25 November 2019.

Surely if Asian & U.s.a mentality can understand that 1/2 naked female is just as ‘clothed’ as topless male, and full naked male= full naked female (and female require to show her vagina to be count as naked- just same like what society demand when they said ‘naked’ to men sexes), they will stop objectifying male frontal nudity only at fam rating movie / public nude fest – either they’ll free the vagina too fairly there, or protect male modesty too.

I’m in process making satire video of sexist – misandry ‘objectification of men form’ cfnm oblation run… so no much time update my blog… so here some female form for us to admire for a while.. Do I hypocrite? no, since I protest objectification of male form at public fam rating place/ legal film, or why male body got objectified more frontally at legal film? (i.e show male penis yet protect vagina with merkins like ‘Euphoria Hbo’), while this picture is just illegal female exhibitionist, so femininity (modesty type) feminist don’t twisted it okay? especially when I gave some example in this paragraph.

If you got mad over (Just) illegal exhibitionist women at Un-crowded place, THEN GET MAD TOO AT OBJECTIFICATION OF MALE BODIES AT LEGAL PUBLIC INSTITUTION LIKE OBLATION, AND OBJECTIFICATION OF MEN FORM IN (MORE) FRONTAL WAY AT LEGAL U.S & U.K MOVIE! HYPOCRITE FEMININE FEMINIST!