FB REFUSED TO REMOVE TWERKING VIDEO OF MIN0R – EVEN IF IT BARE BUTT BECAUSE THE GENDER IS A BOY (A TYPICAL FROM HYPOCRITE ANTI PAE D0 MAINSTREAM), 8 SEPTEMBER 2023

Facebook reject our report, and kept allowed video of 3 minor boy cry in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes, worse how they claim “O it’s not violated our community guidelines, we are Pro, we hire Pro” Bs:

Facebook policy clearly state that 1) A minor kid genital will be removed even if it’s cover by transparent clothes 2) Even if no private shown but if a minor kid not wear clothes at their upper,& bottom will also be removed 3) A minor kid buttcrack will also be removed. This alone show how facebook (and probably other top media ie Instagram/ Youtube/ Tiktok etc) not being professional by betraying their own policy.

Facebook policy seem only care to protect minor girl Only (and ignorance on an Underage Boy Victim/ Dignity/ modesty), many of fb policy written “this girl’s part”, “that girl’s part”.

Think about this, Fb immediately removed ‘a minor half naked topless girl’, even can removed ‘a 1/3 naked girl’. Fb strictly removed ‘girl in undie’- let alone ‘girl’s buttcrack’.. even fb can strictly removed girl in full clothes dance just because they perceived it “se xual”, okay By thisThen How The f Fb relax allowed video of an underage boy – three minor boy, in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes during circumcision (a pseudo science practice that normalize boy se xual abuse) vid!? Hellooo

Yeah after this blatant unfairness against boy, that mainstream “anti ped0”, and “anti woke” i.e puritan feminist,& it “hero” dude, influencer, top media, United Nation still push narration “Why always only happened to girl?” and if I critic their hypocrisy = “O whataboutism again, we are fair- but boy voice (on reply section) silence, now time for girl voice (on every video from big influencer channel,& all top organization media againnn)”

Facebook also refused to removed video of ‘an underage boy who pull his pants down – exposed his minor boy buttcrack, and Twerking after adult female gave him a gesture sign to do so’. I remember when every Anti ped0 mainstream said “Twerk in dress must be count as se xual” when justify Fb, or any other media removed girl dance video, even angry when I questioned “How about sumo? Minor teen boy almost naked (with sexy mawashi only) wrestling in butt pop up style position [*which do 99% similar, or if not – it’s male nudity that been more exposed]= this people excused “well no twerk haha”. Now a video of boy pull his short shown his minor buttcrack, and Twerk after adult female told him= Fb, and this mainstream “Anti ped0, anti woke” together in their Hypocrisy mislead us to believe “It not se xual” by act blind, worse they even not shame to display their hypocrisy.

I almost think if they doesn’t care on ‘exploitation of boy at sumo, atleast they will remove boy in dress twerking’ right? Because it what they state when attacking me with “O howaboutism again” – yet now they even relax boy without shorts twerk his bare buttcrack, not care to outrage like they did if happen to girl, and even not shame with their hypocrisy.

*This is why you must understand how angry I’m with this nudity inequality, and hypocrisy- that always make justification if it objectified male even teen boy nudity (when they alone outrage crazily if it happen to female), how lot of courage I took to spoke up about male dignity/ boy modesty, how many mental it take to received ignorance, ridicule and insult, and yet still need to kept to talk diplomatically, you don’t know how many anxiety I face during raising awareness, or met new hypocrisy again… for almost 10s year, without significant change in society, even worse now rather than they admit their hypocrisy, in their ignorance they start to use “O whataboutism again” tactic to silence us… so don’t get mad if now I start my own world Cmnf project- I couldn’t force you, and you couldn’t dictate me too then.

Cuties Netflix Vs Sumo Boy “Not Comparable” said an ignorant men, I’ll show why it’s do comparable, 22 February 2021

So a (typical mainstream) dude replying me when I ask “Hei, you all angry over ‘s*x ual*zation’ of girl who (just) dance (in full uniform) at Cuties Netflix so much like crazy, but then – by borrowing your mindset – how about und*r ag* sumo boy who being expos*d (or ‘objectified’ in my word) wear ‘undie’ only fight/ compete at Public- Even Held by Legal Sport at Asia (which often more prudish when it come to female custom), boy popping up his b* tt which actually like twerking too”.

Then I got a reply from a this dude who (in sinister) reply me (in a nutshell he said something sound like “Twerking is designed to be imhertly s* xual unlike sumo. To put what essentially equates to soft core ch*ld p * rn on a popular & easily accessible streaming platform for ALL the p* d* to watch & feel emboldened by, is not comparable to a sport that been around for centuries, and is meant to showcase, strength, and athleticism, and pride, I’ll leave you with this one note.”

Now, You been subjective, My answer is: How do he sure ‘only twerking is s exual’? don’t you think a puber boy with undie only & wrestling ‘by pop up his ass’ style can be s exual? Why he so sure only twerking 1 that can be soft core child p*rn then? How he sure pe d* will only watch cuties netflix? while sumo boy – which also easily accessible will not be watch by female/ gay pe d*? Fyi there’s female pe d* (/ gay pe d*) web who include sumo boy videos frequently on their web for soft core child p*rn (will show the evidence later), also this two is actually similar enough so how on earth he think ‘only sumo boy who pop up his boy butt- without short’ is for “pride”? when he complain about girl twerking.

The essence is actually the same. a ‘girl (in uniform) twerking (/dancing) at (popular accessible streaming platform) netflix’ vs ‘(an und*rage) boy (wear undie only) compete (wrestling in ‘d*ggy style’ position) at (popular accessible) sumo (Public) competition which then broadcast on (accessible watching family platform) youtube/ Instagram/ tv’= is almost similar- if not ‘more exp*sing boy’ I would said. How on earth for almost exact same situation, this guy easily jump to conclusion that: one must be “s exual & soft core p*rn” while another one must be about “pride, athleticism” (/ else, for exact same situation one should be banned & teach our kid modesty, while another one should be protected, let kid be shameless & be happy).

Another of his subjectivity claim, how on earth he so sure that no pr*dat*r ever that will attracted to view sumo boy on youtube? surely sumo boy can be attractive for (male/ female pr*dat*r too- it’s not about ‘must twerking first’ to be “s exualize” some attracted just to see boy in mawashi (Fyi female/ gay pae do web include sumo puber boy vid on their page, will show you the evidence later*)… on the other hand even pr*dat*r can view a ‘full uniform’ cuties netflix as normal/ not attractive – esp if he live at Europe, which already accustomed with ‘skin’- a tanktop modest uniform shouldn’t be a big deal even if you dancing (Fyi twerking & other dance almost similar, it have moving ass movement too to be honest). It’s funny when (example) sumo boy is a victim of objectification= they will probably perceived “nah, even if pre dator exist, they only see it at their own room, so not harm the boy”, but if Cuties “Don’t you understand it accessible for evil guy to watch at their own room?”

Let me put this way:

1. If it’s about ‘Cuties Netflix Twerking Girl’ Vs ‘Sumo Boy Fight in D*ggy Style position’= “O Not comparable, even if she still in proper uniform dance, count it as “s* xu al*zation of girl”, ignored her pride happiness of dancing & let bring fear paranoia of p* d* (who will just watch it at their own room at Netflix apps to be honest), while the reverse sumo boy must not be count as s exualization- even if the boy almost nu d* & wrestling by popping up his boy b utt style publicly, ignored even if sometime boy *ss already been zoom close up by media at youtube, ignored bystander who took photos near them: we must only count that boy “moving ass” sumo as “pride of sport, athleticism”.

2. If it’s about ‘Cuties Netflix Twerking G*rl’ Vs (Somehow in parallel world) it’s ‘Sumo girl who wear und*e only compete’= You all will angry over Cuties, but will perceived that Sumo girl wear mawashi only is more worse since ‘more revealing’ + ‘have a look a like of twerking movement’ which make most mainstream more upset, uproar than Cuties

3. If it’s about ‘Tank top boy Twerking’ (or even ‘t*pless bruce lee boy – Ryusei Imai show off his muscles’) vs (in parallel world) ‘Sumo girl wear und*e only compete’= “Sumo g*rl need to be banned, s* xu aliza t*on, Castr*te for men who held this…, twerking what?”

Above meme show you that prudish feminist & “superhero” dude will still just try to banned “girl in swimsuit one only” (even if already no twerking at all). Now They’ll perceived “semi nudity is s exual” if it about girl in swimsuit (but if boy wear undie only= “O not se xual, where’s the twerking?”.. see?). *Fyi probably that swimsuit catwalk already extinct/ banned…. now before you claim that this not comparable (again) “O sumo boy sport, while this catwalk, different”, look at pic below: a ‘muscles show’ were t* en Boy join, more apple to apple right? I’ll wait for your condemnation then towards this pic below (were undrage puber boy been objectified walk at stage topless & show off his muscles).. esp I’ll wait feminist Rita Panahi to whine just like when she mad over catwalk girl.

By the way, bonus memes of mine about ‘female are visual to topless male too’, feel free to share it. also remember: a cheerleader female who s* cks boy p* nis since she couldn’t resist it with her senses, remember? (U.s case).

Also some People reply to my blog but I hv no times to reply them 1 by 1, give me time.

*Before haters accused me as hypocrite, I wrote this article since I observed: if it about girl= mainstream already try their best for campaign/ banned it like all example mentioned above (even castr*tion system legalize), but if a boy= cricket (even the worse one were bunch of boy being str*p publicly – no curtain & ge n* tal being cut during mgm/ circ*m cision were many boy cry either shy or pain= most Asian female/ mother still think it should be “normal” (let alone the sumo boy), the mother even let an adult female to took photos of undrage bottomless boy (which if reverse they will be cry baby again – count it as “har*ss”/ “ab*se”), then this adult female very relax try to fool the crying boy by gift in the end.. yet what I saw on tv only about “girl victim” issues once a mom play victim on tv act like “O why ab* se to girl been normalize?”- when almost all media + feminist + police + politician + society all do help her to jailed that guy at that time without mercy, without excused, this mom even enter national news…. said it again “only girl victim normalize”.. hypocrite..This is why I raise awareness on boy modesty & boy dignity & mentioned boy victim of harassment by female. ** It’s funny when I question about country A were only boy been exp*sed while girl already protected, some one reply me “How about girl at country B? hypocrite” (when at country B boy at there also been expos*d aka already equal) ***I personally less care if already “equal in their dresscode”, get it?