tiktok

FB REFUSED TO REMOVE TWERKING VIDEO OF MIN0R – EVEN IF IT BARE BUTT BECAUSE THE GENDER IS A BOY (A TYPICAL FROM HYPOCRITE ANTI PAE D0 MAINSTREAM), 8 SEPTEMBER 2023

Facebook reject our report, and kept allowed video of 3 minor boy cry in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes, worse how they claim “O it’s not violated our community guidelines, we are Pro, we hire Pro” Bs:

Facebook policy clearly state that 1) A minor kid genital will be removed even if it’s cover by transparent clothes 2) Even if no private shown but if a minor kid not wear clothes at their upper,& bottom will also be removed 3) A minor kid buttcrack will also be removed. This alone show how facebook (and probably other top media ie Instagram/ Youtube/ Tiktok etc) not being professional by betraying their own policy.

Facebook policy seem only care to protect minor girl Only (and ignorance on an Underage Boy Victim/ Dignity/ modesty), many of fb policy written “this girl’s part”, “that girl’s part”.

Think about this, Fb immediately removed ‘a minor half naked topless girl’, even can removed ‘a 1/3 naked girl’. Fb strictly removed ‘girl in undie’- let alone ‘girl’s buttcrack’.. even fb can strictly removed girl in full clothes dance just because they perceived it “se xual”, okay By thisThen How The f Fb relax allowed video of an underage boy – three minor boy, in naked condition, uncensored, penis been zoom in blood for 7 minutes during circumcision (a pseudo science practice that normalize boy se xual abuse) vid!? Hellooo

Yeah after this blatant unfairness against boy, that mainstream “anti ped0”, and “anti woke” i.e puritan feminist,& it “hero” dude, influencer, top media, United Nation still push narration “Why always only happened to girl?” and if I critic their hypocrisy = “O whataboutism again, we are fair- but boy voice (on reply section) silence, now time for girl voice (on every video from big influencer channel,& all top organization media againnn)”

Facebook also refused to removed video of ‘an underage boy who pull his pants down – exposed his minor boy buttcrack, and Twerking after adult female gave him a gesture sign to do so’. I remember when every Anti ped0 mainstream said “Twerk in dress must be count as se xual” when justify Fb, or any other media removed girl dance video, even angry when I questioned “How about sumo? Minor teen boy almost naked (with sexy mawashi only) wrestling in butt pop up style position [*which do 99% similar, or if not – it’s male nudity that been more exposed]= this people excused “well no twerk haha”. Now a video of boy pull his short shown his minor buttcrack, and Twerk after adult female told him= Fb, and this mainstream “Anti ped0, anti woke” together in their Hypocrisy mislead us to believe “It not se xual” by act blind, worse they even not shame to display their hypocrisy.

I almost think if they doesn’t care on ‘exploitation of boy at sumo, atleast they will remove boy in dress twerking’ right? Because it what they state when attacking me with “O howaboutism again” – yet now they even relax boy without shorts twerk his bare buttcrack, not care to outrage like they did if happen to girl, and even not shame with their hypocrisy.

*This is why you must understand how angry I’m with this nudity inequality, and hypocrisy- that always make justification if it objectified male even teen boy nudity (when they alone outrage crazily if it happen to female), how lot of courage I took to spoke up about male dignity/ boy modesty, how many mental it take to received ignorance, ridicule and insult, and yet still need to kept to talk diplomatically, you don’t know how many anxiety I face during raising awareness, or met new hypocrisy again… for almost 10s year, without significant change in society, even worse now rather than they admit their hypocrisy, in their ignorance they start to use “O whataboutism again” tactic to silence us… so don’t get mad if now I start my own world Cmnf project- I couldn’t force you, and you couldn’t dictate me too then.

WHATABOUTISM DO NECESSARRY TO EXPOSED PURITAN FEMINIST,& IT “HERO” DUDE INFLUENCER’S HYPOCRISY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2023

Now I want to counter “O whataboutism again”- a feminine feminism (& it “hero” dude), religious bigot, and right wing/ conservative influencer tactic to hide feminist hypocrisy, and even worse they have audacity to mislead our intention (which is pure questioning why they apply obvious hypocrisy- which by that hope for male,& boy victim to be more fairly acknowledge by media) as somehow we who ask “how about” are the one who have “bad intention against female victim” (which by this portrait them as “more victim” at the same time): when reality they are the 1 who’s hypocrite, and try to silence/ shaming male,& boy victim voice. Mainstream do believe this cliché, and ask me “why you must whine about male/ boy victim every time on female victim video, huh!? You must be a women hater! You not helping boy! Prove female voice difficult to be heard!” Bs, okay, here is my answer:

1. Sure, when ton of other comment on same video talk about other different metoo case= this same people have no problem at all, perfectly fine- even glorified it. The moment I talk ‘mentoo’ this people immediately gather to attack this one person- who talk about male,& even boy victim “O whataboutism again, look we are fair, but men or boy victim silence, now our female time to speak up (yeah always female time), just complain on your own platform! (my 11 follower Instagram?), and we will help (which they never does)”

2. The reason I ask “how about men?” is simple: I always observed how top media only talk/ post/ upload video about ‘female victim (esp by men perpetrator)’ they maximalize the victimhood of female, and the evilness of male, update the news everyday, push society to kept pressure court til heavy punishment is given, and kept whining even if the case already over. The moment it male or boy victim case= relax, silence even if the case still viral (the news only brought by non feminist media*), or if they in a rare moment bring it up (mostly if it male victim with male perpetrator- not the female perpetrator one) they will try to minimize the victimhood of male/ boy victim,& minimize the evilness of female perpetrator. I do make video/ tweet on my own platform but ‘I tweet= I Rt alone’ even some from their side just come to mock me, or said “they doesn’t get it why I make a big deal if female touch men nip? It not genital penis” (said the same people who complain if men touch female waist, or leg, or hand “O stop normalize men who whistling to female, it rape! Stop normalizing it”), so the effective way to gain attention + make people aware their hypocrisy is to speak when this hypocrite whinning on vid/ post of female victim case, get it?

3. Look female victim have been supported strongly by top media, feminist media, conservative influencer, right wing politician (inc left one to be honest) who will by default make ton of video if it ‘female victim by men perv’ case (they never talk/ atleast very rarely talk about male, or boy victim especially by female predator), even more every mainstream netizen also support female victim voice by brought up ‘female victim’ story on comment section all the time. We men, and boy case doesn’t have that privilege yet still the moment I only post one or two comment about men issues on reply section (which hidden between thousand of other comment)= they then try to shame, and silence us without give us chance to have voice! But surely “O it always female voice that difficult to be heard because block by howaboutism dude”

4. I never heard on any other topic were people said “stop talking (what not suit our agenda), just talk at your own room!” only at feminist discussion this become trend (I guess since feminist kept got exposed on their double standard so they start creating this “stop howaboutism” tactic)

5. Feminine feminist told us to talk only at our own platform, when they alone kept tag other people at Instagram, promote advert of their movement/ female case, put poster of their cause at public facilities, make a huge demonstration, and tantrum on the street Ie Spain Kissgate case, how if I tell them to just speak up on their own room/ office? by the way below when katy perry pinch 20yo young male nip twice without consent at live stage= female cheerz together, if anti whataboutism claim they are fair- then why no same rage like “Spain kissgate” case?

6. Even worse if I speak on our platform ie our own channel at youtube/ tiktok/ fb/ Instagram= this tiktok,& “America tiktok” try to shut me down!

7. Feminine feminism alone when they protest unfairness towards women= they alone often said “Why this Muslim have discussion about men allowed to marry 4 female? How about women marry several men?” every “O howabout again” dude silence, the moment we ask “Why feminist whine fgm only while ignored mgm/ circumcision at Muslim society?”= “O whataboutism again, look we are fair, but we will (shamelessly) said mgm is perfectly okay, fgm is harm, learn (pseudo) science plz, ahaha”

8. Also sometime “O howaboutism again” by Feminist,& it “macho” dude is ludicrous when I question the newest case of boy victim on old youtube video about 1970 case of female being harassed= still the answer is “O whataboutism again, we fair but boy victim silence, now time for this female victim (at 1970) case”. Another is they use “O Howaboutism again” to shame us for bringing boy victim, and told us to now focus on case like ‘female being whistles by men’.

Here 2 example of word of people who arguing me, and what my answer is:

1. “O whatabout (again) *clown meme*, how about you record documentary about this boy, this one is about her”

Answer: Do you said the same when on same comment section many other female talk about other case of female victim story? If I make my own video (or post on other men issues platform) usually almost no/ less viewer- it need extra help by comment on place were our voice can be more heard. “O this 1 is for her” only in feminist world we can hear this cliché “we are fair but men,& boy shut up, this time is for her .. O and other case of female victim story” (read: metoo yes, mentoo shut the f up, but we are fair!”

2. “how is what you are saying make her story less potential? The way you claim her story to be a “rumour” is just disgusting. Don’t pretend to care about that boy- if you did you wouldn’t bring it up when another victim is speaking”

Answer: Look about “rumour” that s/he try to frame me- It’s not about downplay her voice, English is not my mother tongue basically I only ask “Hei you all already grieve if it female victim case even if she couldn’t prove the evidence being touch, then why when on other day, you all see infront of your own eyes ‘nurse photos/ selfie/ touch naked minor boy in an innap way at public= you all relax, even laugh,& try to justified it by mantra word ‘circumcision?’ “ So I care about boy that’s why I speak up on place were my voice for boy can be easily been gain attention, and place were mainstream will notice their hypocrisy (if at our own platform- I tweet I Rt alone, or you doesn’t get it “what a deal if katty perry touch men nip? It not genital, it not penis haha” (said same people who outrage if ‘men touch female leg, or just whistle’, and want to jail them). It you who try to downplay boy victim voice (look I talk about boy victim- s/he doesn’t even care, and just try to shaming me, busy to mislead other as somehow “I try to silence female voice”. By saying “you not try to help boy” you alone downplay boy victim, and wonder when I said you’re hypocrite). Okay after shaming me,& mislead other to perceived me as the bad 1 for speak of boy victim voice- then will you on next day will give the same effort speak on boy? Or just hypocrite like yeSterday? Relax seeing ‘female nurse photo,& touch minor boy in an innap way at public circumcision’, be honest, you Don’t (prove me wrong).

The Irony – How Southeast Asian Feminine Type Feminist, and Mother who very Talented when Grieving &Whine “Castra tion” of Suspected ‘Men Pa e do’ (just by hear a story), yet very relax even if seeing ‘Adult Female Touch Boy inappropriately’ (infront of her own eyes), 17 October 2021

Before entering my main point, let me made this Clear: I’m not here for “attacking” any group of people, nor this about ‘ha te’, I’m here to exercise my Freedom of Speech to speak up Unpopular Taboo issues, that is: How boy face hypocrisy from so called ‘Anti p ae do superhero’ in society, which mean I do raise awareness to protect boy too. Big social media like Youtube/ Facebook/ Instagram (maybe Tiktok too) several time removed my post, or suspend me because either misinterpreted my point, you know unpopular view often seen as “offensive” since more taboo (or maybe behind the authority who review my post is a ‘feminine type of feminist’, or ‘religious dude’ who to be honest dislike my unpopular view since against their narrative believe that ‘only female suffer, only men evil’ bs, which why twisted any of my word that they can twist, the newest was when instagram removed my comment that they twisted as “ha te speech”, just because there’s 1 angry word that I put out of my frustration, in the end of the day: we’re human who can frustrate too don’t we?).

So (living for 30s years at Southeast Asia) I observed how modesty type of feminist, (& it’s “superhero” dude), media i.e Bbc Southeast Asia, politician, and government was very good when campaign & lecture us ‘how men p a ed o should be castra te’ (or strip nak d, or even b*rn alive) without mercy, they will said something sound like “Think about girl trauma, how pa e d o act can be normalize? prove only girl are victim” (when everytime there’s a story of ‘girl victim of men pa e do’= it very easy to viral, media make the news 24/7, almost all of the people angry/ sad, and want to help, which then police & even mr. President alone in action. Which by this: the narrative of “girl victim normalize” alone is debunked).

Media often try their best to campaign female victim (by evil men), sadly ignored male victim (esp if the predator is a female), which I’ll prove by photos below

Yet on the other day they alone (majority of people) celebrate circum cision fest were bunch of an undr age pu ber boy been str ip frontal bottom less at hall without curtain (you think it’s ‘fine’? imagine if reverse: I give you bonus, imagine the girl still wear underwear), most of the cutter must be adult female learner (“Boy should feel Lucky” they said), Inappropriate thing do happened, boy cry (adult female after touching boy then give boy a gift, for boy to stop crying), and all southeast asian female/ mother know it, or see it infront of her own eyes= ‘a normal day’ not even realize their hypocrisy, not realize how it’s a ‘boy victim, and boy trauma’ that been normalize by this ra pe culture, by the way can I castra te Vagina of pae d o adult female (towards boy)? you not even let people str ip her don’t you “Oh even if she seem look like mo lest the boy, the castra tion of vulva/ str ip a pa e do women is a hara ssment understand?”

Another excused was “many boy want it therefore okay”, this is biased, let me put this way, if boy feel uncomfort/ shy will be str ip bottom less during circum cision, fear of s x ual abuse/ geni tal cutting, he cry then see his surrounding act perfectly normal, even encourage him= off course he will think “maybe i’m the 1 whose wrong”, on the other hand I remember prudish feminist told a story about a girl who think she got ‘sign of love’ by adult men who touch her, and this feminist said “You been har ass you know, you should start cry, and grieving”, see?

See? how biased this all, before you excusing “circum is abu se, but it different from pa e d “, don’t lie to yourself I already shown the evidence that ‘innap thing also happened at this circum tradition esp if you let adult female to interact with undr age pu ber boy’ (Funny how anti leftist love to said, when it come to trans toilet: “Oh is that so difficult to understand don’t let men enter female room?”.. yet they alone doesn’t understand that ‘Don’t Let Adult Female to Get Easy Access to Interact With Bottom less Undr age Pu ber Boy at Circum’ *by the way some hypocrite female who enter male toilet can also see, even stare at bunch of peeing men & boy too, since urinal have no door, yes peeing penis + his undie can be seen, even the 1 who try not to look will still see men undie/ male way of peeing, way of men opening his zip.. again since men pee at no door urinoir difficult not to see, and men who uncomfort exist too, like me)

Last I want to satire Oblationrun / Pylon run (Cfnm aka ‘objectification of male student’s bodies’ fest) which was held by F institution University of Philippines at prudish Southeast Asian country by showing them this Cmnf memes.

Five women protest naked inside the Chamber of Deputies on March 08, 2010 in Mexico City demanding the resignation of Mexican President Felipe Calderon in the framnework of the International Women’s day. AFP PHOTO/HO

Another update: at Cambodia they have culture at their rural area were ‘female (mother, grandmother, aunty, nurse, nanny, caretaker) can “touch, or even worse “kiss/ s ucks” an under a ge Boy pe nis/ nu dity’. Study (which some of it writing I shown on meme below) inform many people still thinks ‘an Adult touch/ “kiss” mi nor is not “se xual” (as long as the adult is a female, and the mi nor – who been touch/ s ucks when he nak ed – is a Boy)’ (I add: in which if it is ‘men who touch 1 (full dress) girl waist/ just leg’ will be count as “s exual hara ssment/ s exual”), Another horrible excused they give is “If female touch/ “kiss” under a ge boy nu dity” is must be because “she care/ love Boy”. This is very bias:

  1. They alone already make a ‘conclusion’ on 1st place (that “it will be only ‘s exual’ if men do it to a girl”, or “if adult female do it (s exually ha rassed) to an under a ge boy – we must believe it purely because of “care/ love”). If we want to be objective don’t ever jump to conclusion on 1st place.
  2. Study’s interview show ‘female who said find pe nis attractive’ then took an effort to knee down, pull boy pants, then pull of boy underwear, and – not only touch boy pe nis anymore yet even – s ucks boy pe nis (if photos of illustration I gave on meme is from Cambodia mean: she also want to record it for her sweet memory (or “documentary” as that society will said)). How the F it’s “not s exual” anymore? “O it not s exual haha” said “anti pe do”, or “anti ra pist” mainstream who often lecture us “How you said men touch leg of (full clothed) girl is not s exual?”
  3. If adult female have a dirty mind, she live Cambodia, and she did her creep thing to a boy= she can hide her pervertness in the name of “culture”, and ‘her pe do ness’ been praise as “care”, who knows?
  4. This female never do it to a girl, but always to a boy, sure nothing s exual
  5. Study said ‘erecti on’ already happened, how it’s somehow “not s exual”?
  6. Think, if men, and women both – with a desire – do a ha rassment (touch/ kiss) towards mi nor/ child of their opposite s exes= the men will fastly realize, and admit it “pe do”, but the female will think “she did it out of love, men must more do it in dirty mind”, why? because that what we been taught at “school” right? and you encourage it
  7. If father angry during his travel to Cambodia- his son been touch by a lady, so in his anger, he revenge by touch her daughter back in emotion= sure “only men do it with s exual intention”
  8. Imagine if there’s a cult were men can kiss a babygirl, baby- which most men find NoT s exual, mean big chance men kiss cheek of full dress babygirl is not because of s exual thing, or he just follow a culture, or aka ‘he is victim of culture’ but anti pe do (conservative – rights wing, feminist,& it’s “superhero” dude, crime story youtuber/ influencer, politician, top media ie Bbc) will simply said “it ra pe culture”, “men must be perv, stop victim blaming, period. Castration” (look it’s just a men kiss (full dress) baby at cheek, except if men allow to kiss nu de mi nor). Yet the moment in real life it ‘adult female who can even hand job/ b j nak ed boy’ somehow “O she do it because victim of cult itself”, No, she did it in her pervertness, and hide it in the name of “culture”, she not a victim, she’s a pe do/ female ra pist, and the boy is a Victim of ra pe. Anti pe do alone love to victim blaming if perpe trator is female, and the victim is a boy.
  9. About “how if boy smile?” – I remember feminist told me “there’s a girl who think a men who lick her V is a sign of love/ care, and she like it”, then this feminist said to the girl “you been ra pe, and you must grieving,& crying now”

Stop kriit now